Not disagreeing with YOU at all Shmuel but apparently the customer *perception* is that ABO-compiled code does not have to be re-tested significantly. That is part of the premise here.
Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) Sent: Monday, November 23, 2015 9:00 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Interesting Article About Cobol In <CAAJSdjhXJSn-JYq_0awmCcL+ND6cdddV3EiTD0WJz2Sn4Qc-=g...@mail.gmail.com>, on 11/23/2015 at 09:02 AM, John McKown <[email protected]> said: >But if the optimizer actually "recompiles" >the object code into new object code, then doesn't that new object code >need to be as thoroughly tested as the original, unoptimized, code? Yes. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
