Isn't this Subject: line an oxymoron? (DUCKING!)
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) < [email protected]> wrote: > In <[email protected]>, on 11/23/2015 > at 10:54 AM, Charles Mills <[email protected]> said: > > >Not disagreeing with YOU at all Shmuel but apparently the customer > >*perception* is that ABO-compiled code does not have to be > >re-tested significantly. > > Well, it's not my dog. If you've informed the customer of the risks > and he still wants to omit testing, on his head be it. Just get it in > writing to CYA. > > -- > Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT > ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html> > We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress. > (S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > -- zMan -- "I've got a mainframe and I'm not afraid to use it" ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
