In <[email protected]>, on 11/23/2015
at 10:54 AM, Charles Mills <[email protected]> said:
>Not disagreeing with YOU at all Shmuel but apparently the customer
>*perception* is that ABO-compiled code does not have to be
>re-tested significantly.
Well, it's not my dog. If you've informed the customer of the risks
and he still wants to omit testing, on his head be it. Just get it in
writing to CYA.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
ISO position; see <http://patriot.net/~shmuel/resume/brief.html>
We don't care. We don't have to care, we're Congress.
(S877: The Shut up and Eat Your spam act of 2003)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
