On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 09:56:21 -0500, Richards, Robert B. wrote: >>But it occurs to me that one could construct and ACCEPT (or UCLIN "ACCEPT") >>a ++USERMOD that adds a part so named as not to conflict with IBM and other >>software vendors' part names, and NPRE that usermod in all one's "real" >>usermods >>to prevent them from being ACCEPTed. Of course, one would never APPLY that >>only-to-be-NPREed usermod. > >Thanks, John! If memory serves me correctly, this is what we were doing.
So is the SMP/E Reference manual wrong where it says, <quote> NPRE indicates which function SYSMODs cannot exist in the same zone as this function. These are negative prerequisite SYSMODs. The current SYSMOD cannot be applied or accepted if any of the listed SYSMODs are already present. This operand has no effect on RECEIVE eligibility. NPRE can only be specified within a function SYSMOD. </quote> Or am I misunderstanding what is written? I read it as saying that you can't use it for ++USERMODs. -- Tom Marchant ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
