Tom,
If it were not possible, why then this error message?
GIM42702E SYSMOD sysmod1 WAS NOT ACCEPTED BECAUSE IT IS MUTUALLY
EXCLUSIVE (NPRE) WITH FUNCTION SYSMOD sysmod2, WHICH WAS
ALREADY ACCEPTED.
Explanation:
sysmod1 ID of the SYSMOD being installed
sysmod2 ID of the SYSMOD that is already installed
Mutually exclusive SYSMODs cannot be installed on the same
system. SYSMOD sysmod1 was not accepted because a mutually
exclusive SYSMOD, SYSMOD sysmod2, had already been accepted.
System Action: SYSMOD processing stops. Message GIM37001S
follows this message and shows that command processing also
fails.
Programmer Response: Do one of the following:
o If you do not want to process SYSMOD sysmod1, do one of
the following:
- Use the REJECT command to remove SYSMOD sysmod1 from
the global zone.
- Specify SYSMOD sysmod1 on the EXCLUDE operand to
exclude it from processing.
o If you want to process SYSMOD sysmod1, use UCLIN to
delete SYSMOD sysmod2.
Then rerun the ACCEPT command.
Maybe John or Kurt can explain it. I only know it was referenced (PREREQ in
SYSMOD1/++USERMOD maybe) and worked.
Bob
-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
Of Tom Marchant
Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 10:41 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: SMPE: Un-ACCEPTing USERMOD
On Fri, 12 Feb 2016 09:56:21 -0500, Richards, Robert B. wrote:
>>But it occurs to me that one could construct and ACCEPT (or UCLIN
>>"ACCEPT") a ++USERMOD that adds a part so named as not to conflict
>>with IBM and other software vendors' part names, and NPRE that usermod
>>in all one's "real" usermods to prevent them from being ACCEPTed. Of
>>course, one would never APPLY that only-to-be-NPREed usermod.
>
>Thanks, John! If memory serves me correctly, this is what we were doing.
So is the SMP/E Reference manual wrong where it says,
<quote>
NPRE indicates which function SYSMODs cannot exist in the same zone as this
function. These are negative prerequisite SYSMODs. The current SYSMOD cannot be
applied or accepted if any of the listed SYSMODs are already present. This
operand has no effect on RECEIVE eligibility.
NPRE can only be specified within a function SYSMOD.
</quote>
Or am I misunderstanding what is written? I read it as saying that you can't
use it for ++USERMODs.
--
Tom Marchant
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to
[email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
