All,

It's hard to imagine that any customer is limited to specific volume size 
nowadays.

For a decade or so now all the storage vendors have delivered the ability to 
make right-sized volumes, usually only limited to what z/OS supported around 
the time the controller model was introduced.

With virtual volumes now (HDS call it HDP) creating a right-sized volume is a 
piece of cake. Being in a lab this has made life extraordinarily easy to 
provision a range of volume sizes with a couple of mouse clicks, or some 
scripts. Alternatively, with thin provisioning offered by all three vendors you 
could make your SYSRES a 3390-54 and just use the space required for the one 
pack SYSRES. If you just use 20,000 CYLs then that's all you use from the pool 
- a bit like Iceberg revisited.

Ron

-----Original Message-----
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf 
Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Sunday, May 15, 2016 6:08 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] Respack Volume Size Challenge

Years ago (pre-9) respacks had ‎to be 'split up'. Now, we ask the risk!

-teD
  Original Message
From: Lucas Rosalen
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2016 05:14
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Reply To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Subject: Re: Respack Volume Size Challenge

As far as I have seen, it's quite simple: create a &SYSR2 symbol (using
&SYSR1 and changing last char from 1 to 2, for example) and update MCAT 
accordingly.
Once I've worked for a client that had 3-volumes respack. It indeed worked.
We used to keep datasets like LINKLIB, MACLIB, NUCLEUS, etc in 1st volumes 
though...

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Lucas Rosalen*
Emails: rosalen.lu...@gmail.com / *lrosa...@pl.ibm.com
<lrosa...@br.ibm.com>*
LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/in/lrosalen
Phone: +48 (71) 792 809 198


2016-04-21 10:45 GMT+02:00 Jake Anderson <justmainfra...@gmail.com>:

> Hello,
>
> From the z/OS 2.1, I have started using Mod-27 as the Load 
> address(Respack) for IPLing the z/OS 2.1 LPAR. I am curious how the 
> other Shops are managing when they do not options of using Mod-27 and 
> they have to survive with Mod-9. I believe the Extended Indirect cataloging 
> is one Options.
>
> What kind of challenges are there when the Respack is divided into two 
> Volumes ?
>
> Jake
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send 
> email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to 
lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN

Reply via email to