On 2016-09-18, at 18:46, Jesse 1 Robinson wrote: > Things may have changed since I was an undergrad, but around that time there > some court ruling in California to the effect that merely posting 'No > Trespassing' signs had no legal weight unless 'trespassers' were periodically > locked out. So one day a year the entire campus was closed to outside traffic > just to prove that the postings were enforced--and therefore enforceable. It > was a great inconvenience to everyone, and the practice may have since been > discontinued. The consequences of being unable to prosecute trespassers were > deemed too grave not take preemptory action. > See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adverse_possession http://www.dailycamera.com/ci_13106856
I understand the initial intent of the law was to provide equity in cases of long-established survey errors. Colorado now requires bona fides. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
