Bill, I will have to look, you may be right, I am on vacation, thank god... As a ISV we have been very busy..
Scott On Tuesday, December 27, 2016, Bill Woodger <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks. I think you are probably "getting away with it". Since you are not > using any data from a COBOL program, that DATA(31) is not an issue. I > suspect in your bindered program, the COBOL programs are always "below the > line", so the return-address is not getting accidentally truncated. I think > if you were to what a 16MB table into the initial COBOL program that the > binder would complain. If not, you'd get a run-time problem of some type. > > I guess we'd need to see the binder output to confirm. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] <javascript:;> with the message: > INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
