On 2017-02-01, at 14:01, Sri h Kolusu wrote: >>>> And that gives me: Bad Request > > Paul, > > I have no idea as to how to fix your Bad request error from your browser. > Either way that is besides the point, since you found a working link. > As I follow this list, I observe reports of KC problems so frequently that it's hard for me to accept responsibility on behalf of *my* browser. But tedious trial and error shouldn't be needed to find a working link.
>>>> Regardless, unless IEBCOMPR has been enhanced lately, I ask, how does > it behave in case of an inserted or deleted line? > > May be you overlooked my statement "The output is not as fancy as SuperC , > but it lists the differences." > May I call it an understatement? >>>> I consider the historic behavior of IEBCOMPR worthless except for a > yes/no integrity check. > > Well may be OP can make a decision based on his requirements. It was > merely a suggestion. > Understood. And if the OP is doing mass compares it's likely that he wants to isolate a few changed members for possible further analysis by SuperC. And even as z/OS has IEBCOMPR and SuperC, UNIX has its analogous cmp and diff. I use the former when I want to determine whether a generated version of a file is identical to the previous version in order to suppress replacing it, causing otiose rebuilding of "make" targets. -- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
