On 2017-03-02, at 07:34, Peter Vander Woude wrote: > > I pushed them that our contract for the 2 products from vendor A had totally > different terms, that basically gave us flat charges and/or very minimal > annual increases. It took a bit, but they finally admitted, that they had > not even pulled the contract language from Vendor A, and had to finally give > in and lower the maintenance cost. > "Due diligence" isn't always diligent. There are legends that circa 2010 IBM was interested in acquiring the floundering Sun, but found Sun's existing contract entanglements unacceptable.
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
