On Sun, 30 Apr 2017 07:37:54 -0500, Edward Gould wrote: >> On Apr 25, 2017, at 11:40 PM, Timothy Sipples wrote: >> >> Edward Gould wrote: >>> I can’t talk for others but IBM can’t seem to handle the Internet. >> >> Apparently you missed the part where I explicitly described not relying >> solely on any one entity. And only within the context of extending a >> generous 90 day window. (If two entities are Internet unreachable for 80+ >> days, your own recovery likely isn't possible. ;)) And only for those >> vendors that still insist on keys, something I don't think they should do >> in the first place. > >Timothy: > ... >On the surface 90 days seems reasonable but when you look at how IBM has >reacted to issues in the past in one instance that I know of, I am not so sure. > When your system is down you may want quicker than 90 days, even if only to look up a message explanation or a data area map.
-- gil ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
