> On Apr 25, 2017, at 11:40 PM, Timothy Sipples <[email protected]> wrote: > > Edward Gould wrote: >> I can’t talk for others but IBM can’t seem to handle the Internet. > > Apparently you missed the part where I explicitly described not relying > solely on any one entity. And only within the context of extending a > generous 90 day window. (If two entities are Internet unreachable for 80+ > days, your own recovery likely isn't possible. ;)) And only for those > vendors that still insist on keys, something I don't think they should do > in the first place.
Timothy: While I appreciate your optimism, you didn’t follow one thread. A couple of months ago on here one of IBM’s many people asked us to fill out a survey. I tried and was unsuccessful. When I communicated with the person we exchanged information. After a few exchanges she said too bad and maybe you will try next time. Now, I know a survey isn’t all that important but it showed to me that IBM didn’t get it. IBM has lost their legendary we will make it work ethic. That to me shows that 90 days isn’t enough (I gave up trying after 4 months). On the surface 90 days seems reasonable but when you look at how IBM has reacted to issues in the past in one instance that I know of, I am not so sure. Ed ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
