We do VPS and DRS with a number of printers license, so it isn't effected by CPU capacity. BMC was not easy to deal with. At first, they denied the entire concept of subcapacity licenseing. I think we shifted to some other metric and suffered a $10K re-hosing fee. We don't have TPX, but CA was reasonable with our other products.
No Systemware here. > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] > On Behalf Of Jesse 1 Robinson > Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 12:23 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Moving to capped LPARs > > We'd like to move a few ISV products from a small CEC to a larger CEC with > capped LPARs. The capped LPARs would be no larger than the small-CEC > LPARs they're in now. The question is whether anyone has experience in this > sort of move. In particular, would these vendors likely agree to such a move? > The list includes > > LRS (VPS and DRS) > System Ware (JHS) > BMC (CONTROL-D/V) > CA (TPX) > > Of course we are contacting the vendors directly. Just want a feel for others' > experience. We've never done this before. > > > . > . > J.O.Skip Robinson > Southern California Edison Company > Electric Dragon Team Paddler > SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager > 323-715-0595 Mobile > 626-543-6132 Office <===== NEW > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to > [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
