We moved from a penalty box CEC to an Capped LPAR with no issues but none of your products were part of our stack on that penalty box.
I'm pretty sure that BMC does NOT provide Sub Cap licenses from some of the other products we have from BMC. 2 things to check are if the Vendor will give you a subcap license in the first place, and then if they will accept the capping and how to report on the results. We attempt to have them use the z/OS value for the LPAR in the SCRT report where we can. Jerry Whitteridge Delivery Manager - Safeway 602 527 4871 Mobile [email protected] IBM Services IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> wrote on 03/20/2018 12:22:33 PM: > From: Jesse 1 Robinson <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Date: 03/20/2018 12:23 PM > Subject: Moving to capped LPARs > Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List <[email protected]> > > We'd like to move a few ISV products from a small CEC to a larger > CEC with capped LPARs. The capped LPARs would be no larger than the > small-CEC LPARs they're in now. The question is whether anyone has > experience in this sort of move. In particular, would these vendors > likely agree to such a move? The list includes > > LRS (VPS and DRS) > System Ware (JHS) > BMC (CONTROL-D/V) > CA (TPX) > > Of course we are contacting the vendors directly. Just want a feel > for others' experience. We've never done this before. > > > . > . > J.O.Skip Robinson > Southern California Edison Company > Electric Dragon Team Paddler > SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager > 323-715-0595 Mobile > 626-543-6132 Office <===== NEW > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, > send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
