Skip JHS and LRS products are a function of demand and cycles available. The only thing you are going to slow down is thru put, maybe.
TPX - Just as long as the PATHS, CDRMS and VIPA set up you should see no degradation -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jesse 1 Robinson Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2018 2:23 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Moving to capped LPARs We'd like to move a few ISV products from a small CEC to a larger CEC with capped LPARs. The capped LPARs would be no larger than the small-CEC LPARs they're in now. The question is whether anyone has experience in this sort of move. In particular, would these vendors likely agree to such a move? The list includes LRS (VPS and DRS) System Ware (JHS) BMC (CONTROL-D/V) CA (TPX) Of course we are contacting the vendors directly. Just want a feel for others' experience. We've never done this before. . . J.O.Skip Robinson Southern California Edison Company Electric Dragon Team Paddler SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager 323-715-0595 Mobile 626-543-6132 Office <===== NEW [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to [email protected] with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
