Should have written > 255, of course. Charles
-----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of Charles Mills Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2019 6:56 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SMF exit IEFU086 work area size No, I retired from the SMF exit business on March 31. If I were writing the product today there is no question I would use it: only one exit point to maintain, handles the new > 127 SMF records whenever they come, and the work area is a plus. I used a cell pool for work areas in my exit so it was pretty efficient, but "free" is even better. BTW, IEFU86, right? No 0? Charles -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf Of David Crayford Sent: Tuesday, October 8, 2019 6:27 PM To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU Subject: Re: SMF exit IEFU086 work area size Hi Charles, Yes, it is! SMXP_WORKAREA_LENGTH_V1 EQU 1024 This IEFU086 exit is great! Have you used it? David ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
