>>> On 11/24/2010 at 04:50 PM, William D Carroll >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > My Original Comment on this whole thing was the a 3270 Emulator really is not > a GUI. It is a text based implementation on a GUI desktop, that does not > make it a GUI, your still typing commands.
Of course it is, when you use it to execute commands such as rdrlist, filelist, xedit, cut and paste, and any number of other tasks. Having a GUI doesn't mean you don't type or don't think, it just means you type less, and perhaps different things. My point is, people are conflating using GUIs with incompetence, and the two are orthogonal. They bash other people that use their favorite GUI, but would never be willing to give up their own. My company provides a tool called YaST. It can run as a GUI, or an ncurses application. Or, the sysadmin can do everything from the command line. YaST _can_ make Linux sysadmins' lives easier, but if used exclusively, will actually make them less productive. (Think of adding a couple hundred user accounts to multiple systems. Point and click? No way.) Alternatively, exclusively _not_ using a GUI can also make you less productive. GUIs are good for reducing the amount of time and skill needed for repetitive tasks. (They're also good for automating well-defined tasks that involve a lot of "moving parts" that a human can overlook.) They're not a replacement for a sysadmin's need to understand their OS, and how to accomplish things outside of it. Blasting "people who use GUIs" for being incompetent instead of blasting incompetent (or sorely undertrained) people who just happen to be using a GUI misses the root cause. Mark Post
