oops,  an errant cut-n-paste messed up my last paragraph.  It should read:

The C27 has a 40% ballast ratio and a modest SA/disp of about 15,  and with a 
few not-expensive upgrades to the rig,  is good candidate for sailing in high 
winds. 




________________________________
From: "Judith Blumhorst, DC" <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 7:50:34 AM
Subject: Re: [IC27A] Judy - C27 CE





Your email suggest that you wouldn't be at all happy buying a C27.  I suggest 
you look for a different boat.

Are you suggesting that everybody on San Francisco Bay should get rid of his 
C27 because it isn't safe to sail in our local conditions?

There are hundreds of C27s and crew that have survived thousands of hours of 
sailing in 35 knots of wind on all points of sail without catastophic failure 
of a sound deck or chainplates.  The deck doesn't pulsate at the shroud backing 
plates on my boat.  (The deck is permanently deflected upwards there, LOL!  But 
it hasn't ripped apart after 32 years!)

The C27 has a 40% ballast ratio,  and with a few not-expensive upgrades to the 
rig,  is good candidate for sailing in high winds.  In my opinion, sailing 
skill, seamanship and maintenance are usually the limiting factors.

Fair winds, 
Judy B
Sailing an imperfect boat in an otherwise perfect world :^)




________________________________
From: Jack Brennan <jackbrennan@ bellsouth. net>
To: ic...@yahoogroups. com
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 6:19:06 AM
Subject: RE: [IC27A] Judy - C27 CE


 
Hi Judy:
     Thanks for the welcome.
     You folks out in San Francisco remind me of Vito Dumas in "Alone Through 
the Roaring 40s." The difference is that Leeg II was a double-ender built like 
a tank. Not so the C27s.
     On the '85 I looked at, the chainplates for the forestay and the backstay 
were stainless steel straps a couple of inches wide. The chainplates for the 
shrouds were L-shaped brackets supported solely by the deck. This isn't 
equipment built to take the strain of 35 knots from any point of sail, in my 
opinion. On my old C&C 25 (which, for the record, didn't sail as well as a C27 
does), the shroud chainplates were six inches wide, a foot long and 
through-bolted to the main bulkhead.
     To combat this problem, Patrick Childress had custom chainplates built and 
strapped them to the topsides because he was frightened by the pulsating deck 
where the shroud chainplates were.
     Even then, his sail plan for 35 knots of wind was a storm jib.
     I briefly traded e-mail with Childress a couple of years back on an 
unrelated topic. At one point, I suggested that he write a book about his 
circumnavigation. He said he had decided against it because he didn't want to 
encourage anyone to do what he did. He said that while the C27 is a great boat, 
it just isn't built for offshore-like conditions.
    
 
-----Original Message-----
From: ic...@yahoogroups. com [mailto:IC27A@ yahoogroups. com]On Behalf Of 
Judith Blumhorst, DC
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 3:32 AM
To: ic...@yahoogroups. com
Subject: Re: [IC27A] Judy - C27 CE


Hi jack,

Welcome to the C27/270 Association list.

I agree that it's a little crazy to fly a spinny in 30+ knots, but I think 
you'd be surprised at how much canvas a C27 can carry sailing downwind in those 
conditions.    I've been sailing 49 years, and so far I haven't yet lost a rig, 
nor twisted any hulls nor put a smile at the front of the keel. 

My hubby and I regularly fly a 95% (equivalent to a 110% on a std rig) or 135% 
(equivalent to a std 150%) with full mainsail downwind in 30 knots from the 
Golden Gate Bridge to the Bay Bridge.    That's enough canvas to get the boat 
surfing on the waves.  It's scarey fast.  It takes considerable skill to drive 
in those conditions, because you steer the boat mostly by heeling one way or 
the other as the waves pass under her, with only minor correction with the 
rudder.  If you over react with the rudder, the boat will round up violently or 
round down spectacularly and broach.  

I certainly agree with you that a flat boat is a fast boat on a reach or a 
beat. We reef and shake out reefs all day long depending on our point of sail 
if we wanna go fast and flat.  We can put one in and or shake one out in under 
60 seconds from the cockpit without even rushing.  It's second nature to us.

I'd go even further and say that  a well trimmed boat is a flat boat is a safe 
boat is a fast boat.  Even though we don't race, we can shift gears with the 
best of 'em.  We play the traveller and the sheet leads to put twist in the 
sails, outhaul to control the lower profile, backstay on for upwind to shape 
the draft in the jib, cunningham for acceleration or high end speed.   That's 
probably even more important than reefing.

Fair winds, 
Judy B
1977 C27 Tall Rig #3459, "Bijou"
San Francisco Bay
http://www.blumhors t.com/catalina27 /catalinahomepag e.htm
________________________________

 
 


 
      
  
 


 

Reply via email to