are ya'll through with the PISSING CONTEST!?!!?!?!
 
gimme a break....dropping this forum asap
 
ya'll must have voted for OBAMA-nation too!!!!   
 
I got it now....Pelosi is YOUR senator!!!!   That explains  EVERYTHING!
 
 
In a message dated 6/10/2009 10:51:29 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

 
 



 
Your email suggest that you wouldn't be at all happy buying a C27.   I 
suggest you look for a different boat.
 
Are you suggesting that everybody on San Francisco Bay should get rid of  
his C27 because it isn't safe to sail in our local conditions?
 

There are hundreds of C27s and crew that have survived thousands of  hours 
of sailing in 35 knots of wind on all points of sail without catastophic  
failure of a sound deck or chainplates.  The deck doesn't pulsate at the  
shroud backing plates on my boat.  (The deck is  permanently deflected upwards 
there, LOL!  But it hasn't ripped  apart after 32 years!)
 
The C27 has a 40% ballast ratio,  and with a few not-expensive  upgrades to 
the rig,  is good candidate for sailing in high winds.   In my opinion, 
sailing skill, seamanship and maintenance are usually the  limiting factors.
 
Fair winds, 
Judy B
Sailing an imperfect boat in an otherwise perfect world :^)
 
 
 
 
  
____________________________________
 From: Jack Brennan  <jackbren...@jackbrennajac>
To:  ic...@yahoogroups.  
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 6:19:06  AM
Subject: RE: [IC27A] Judy  - C27 CE


  
Hi  Judy:
     Thanks for the welcome.
     You folks out in San Francisco remind me of  Vito Dumas in "Alone 
Through the Roaring 40s." The difference is that Leeg II  was a double-ender 
built like a tank. Not so the C27s.
     On the '85 I looked at, the chainplates for  the forestay and the 
backstay were stainless steel straps a couple of inches  wide. The chainplates 
for the shrouds were L-shaped brackets supported solely  by the deck. This 
isn't equipment built to take the strain of 35 knots from  any point of sail, 
in my opinion. On my old C&C 25 (which, for the record,  didn't sail as well 
as a C27 does), the shroud chainplates were six inches  wide, a foot long 
and through-bolted to the main bulkhead.
     To combat this problem, Patrick Childress had  custom chainplates 
built and strapped them to the topsides because he was  frightened by the 
pulsating deck where the shroud chainplates  were.
     Even then, his sail plan for 35 knots of wind  was a storm jib.
     I briefly traded e-mail with Childress a  couple of years back on an 
unrelated topic. At one point, I suggested that he  write a book about his 
circumnavigation. He said he had decided against it  because he didn't want to 
encourage anyone to do what he did. He said that  while the C27 is a great 
boat, it just isn't built for offshore-like  conditions.
    
 

-----Original Message-----
From: ic...@yahoogroups. com  [mailto:IC27A@ yahoogroups. com]On Behalf Of 
Judith Blumhorst,  DC
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2009 3:32 AM
To:  ic...@yahoogroups. com
Subject: Re: [IC27A] Judy - C27  CE



 
Hi jack,
 
Welcome to the C27/270 Association list.
 
I agree that it's a little crazy to fly a spinny in 30+ knots, but I  think 
you'd be surprised at how much canvas a C27 can carry sailing  downwind in 
those conditions.    I've been sailing 49 years,  and so far I haven't yet 
lost a rig, nor twisted any hulls nor put a smile  at the front of the keel. 

My hubby and I regularly fly a 95% (equivalent to a 110% on a std rig)  or 
135% (equivalent to a std 150%) with full mainsail downwind in 30 knots  
from the Golden Gate Bridge to the Bay Bridge.    That's  enough canvas to get 
the boat surfing on the waves.  It's scarey  fast.  It takes considerable 
skill to drive in those conditions,  because you steer the boat mostly by 
heeling one way or the other  as the waves pass under her, with only minor 
correction with the  rudder.  If you over react with the rudder, the boat  will 
round up violently or round down spectacularly and broach.   

I  certainly agree with you that a flat boat is a fast boat on a reach or a 
 beat. We reef and shake out reefs all day long depending on our point  of 
sail if we wanna go fast and flat.  We can put one in and or shake  one out 
in under 60 seconds from the cockpit without even rushing.   It's second 
nature to us.
 
I'd  go even further and say that  a well trimmed boat is a flat boat is a  
safe boat is a fast boat.  Even though we don't race, we can shift  gears 
with the best of 'em.  We play the traveller and the sheet leads  to put 
twist in the sails, outhaul to control the lower profile,  backstay on for 
upwind to shape the draft in the jib, cunningham for  acceleration or high end 
speed.   That's probably even more  important than reefing.
 
Fair  winds, 
Judy  B
1977  C27 Tall Rig #3459, "Bijou"
San  Francisco Bay
http://www.blumhorshttp://www.blumhhttp://www.blumhhttp:
  
____________________________________
 






  






 
 














**************Dell Inspiron 15 Laptop: Now in 6 vibrant colors! Shop Dell’s 
full line of laptops. 
(http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100126575x1222008777x1201444407/aol?redir=http:%2F%2Fad.doubleclick.net%2Fclk%3B215566094%3B3786435
8%3Bv)

Reply via email to