Hi all!

I had a question for folks who have converted from inboard A4s or diesels to 
outboards.   

Did you just leave the prop and prop shaft hanging under the boat or did you 
remove it?

If you removed it, how did you fill in the holes in the hull?

Thanks!


-Hugh
-Future C27 owner




________________________________
From: Dan Hardiman <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Mon, March 29, 2010 1:36:20 PM
Subject: Re: [IC27A] Outboard motor mount backing plate

  
Jim,

When I sent my Atomic Four to "atomic-four- heaven" and converted to an 
outboard I used two layers of sealed 1" thick plywood on the inside of the full 
width of the transom and two layers of 3/4" star board on the outside.  On the 
outside you're going to want  a backing plate that stiffens the transom to as 
close to the water line as possible because that is where the most deflection 
of the fiberglass will take place.  The starboard bends a little but it seems 
to do the job.  I mounted an electric start 9.8hp Nissan (Tohatsu) 2 stroke 
with a 25 inch shaft.  It weighs about 125lbs.  I like the simplicity of the 
outboard although maneuvering with it in tight quarters creates more challenges 
than the reckless bumper car style abandon I was able to embrace with the A4.

I would take a picture of how I have it set up but my boat has become a 
mythical vessel that I only see on rare occasions.

Dan Hardiman
C27TR #4149 
Back Creek
Annapolis MD




--- On Mon, 3/29/10, Jim <jim.law...@yahoo. com> wrote:


>From: Jim <jim.law...@yahoo. com>
>Subject: [IC27A] Outboard motor mount backing plate
>To: ic...@yahoogroups. com
>Date: Monday, March 29, 2010, 1:06 PM
>
>
>>
>
>
>
>  >
>
> 
>>      
> 
>Hello,
>
>>I recently purchased a new Suzuki 9.9 to mount on the back of my Catalina 27. 
>> It is a very heavy engine about 150lbs.  I was wondering if it would be 
>>reccomended to have a stainless steel backing plate made or if I will be ok 
>>to use a thick piece of wood as the backing plate for the motor mount?
>
>>Thank you in advance,
>
>>James Lawhun
>
> 

 

Reply via email to