On May 19, 2010, at 3:29 PM, Michael Thomas wrote: > On 05/19/2010 02:21 PM, J.D. Falk wrote: >> On May 19, 2010, at 7:53 AM, MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote: >> >>> +1. The current discussion was supposed to be about BCP. I agree with >>> Stephen with the caveat that if the group thinks re-opening ADSP >>> discussion is important then include it in the re-charter. Personally >>> I'd like to wait until we hear some numbers about ADSP deployment and >>> experience. >> >> +1 > > Doesn't that sort of undermine the impetus to do a BCP on lists? > Most of the sticky questions about lists are intertwined with ADSP, > as evidenced by the recent messages here from paypal folks.
If writing the BCP reveals situations where ADSP makes DKIM difficult for mailing lists, let's document it so that a future effort can work on fixing it. We shouldn't be trying to fix it within the BCP effort. -- J.D. Falk <[email protected]> Return Path Inc _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
