On May 19, 2010, at 7:53 AM, MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote: > +1. The current discussion was supposed to be about BCP. I agree with > Stephen with the caveat that if the group thinks re-opening ADSP > discussion is important then include it in the re-charter. Personally > I'd like to wait until we hear some numbers about ADSP deployment and > experience.
+1 -- J.D. Falk <[email protected]> Return Path Inc _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
