--On 14 June 2010 16:07:03 +0200 "John R. Levine" <[email protected]> wrote:
> It's collateral to the extent that one's users complain about not getting > perfectly good mail. My understanding of "collateral damage" is that third parties are damaged. In an email correspondence, the sender and recipient are the first and second parties respectively. This may or may not be damage, but it's not collateral. -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex 01273-873148 x3148 For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
