--On 19 August 2010 11:18:06 -0700 Dave CROCKER <[email protected]> wrote:
> > dkim's primary use is the attachment of a verifiable label, to be used for > assessment. The nature of the design of the mechanism makes its ability > to be used for this purpose uncontroversial and very low risk. The risk, > now, is all market preference, rather than functional. That is, there is > no technical risk to DKIM's ability to satisfy this requirement. The > extent to which the market finds it useful for that purpose is still > being established. > And, one thing's for sure: uptake is everything. Talking DKIM down increases the risk that we'll never get widespread domain based reputation services. -- Ian Eiloart IT Services, University of Sussex 01273-873148 x3148 For new support requests, see http://www.sussex.ac.uk/its/help/ _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
