Dave CROCKER wrote: > > No doubt some do validate the From: field. Others merely mean "the > message went through my MTA". Any assertion of From: field assessment > is therefore far outside the scope of the DKIM base specification.
This is hard to grasp and conflicts with the DKIM base specification which makes the 5322.FROM a fundamentally required binding hashed entity in the DKIM signature manufacturing. In additional, the 5322.From header is a historic persistent entity from handler to handler. i.e. it can not change for any single and/or collective set of signature. Inherently, there are assessment assertions to be made within DKIM 5322.From binding requirement - ergo the protocol inconsistency with between WG documents. -- Hector Santos, CTO http://www.santronics.com http://santronics.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
