On 08/19/2010 10:23 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > > On 19/08/10 18:06, Michael Thomas wrote: >> On 08/19/2010 09:20 AM, John Levine wrote: >>> Be sure to tell them that ADSP is not useful, according to one of the >>> authors of the ADSP RFC. >> >> Chairs -- >> >> Can I ask for a revision of ADSP where John is stripped out of the document? > > You can ask. The answer is that we don't currently have > a revision of ASDP on our charter and RFCs do not change. > >> It's ridiculous that he presumes to speak for it, > > John was an editor of ADSP, which is a WG product. I think its a fine > thing to do editing work even if you don't agree with the content.
Well, I don't. Would you hire somebody to build a bridge that they think would be fine and dandy if it collapsed? > I personally wouldn't then deride the WG output, but the RFC is what > gets read, so I treat remarks like John's as the background noise that > they are, but I do understand why some WG participants find it annoying. That's because you have scruples. >> and it was a huge mistake >> to give him this undue credibility. Especially when he has none. > > That last is out of order on a list such as this. Please desist. I'd say I'm sorry, but I'm not. You guys made a huge mistake, and John's continuing baseless jihad is a disservice to the community. Mike _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
