> hmmmmmmmmmm, I am surprise that I have to be put into an awkward
> position to explain what "binding" means here as digital signature
> term in what I thought was a technical qroup.  Very odd.

Hector. You are too funny.

You miss the subtlety and then you assume the OP is inexcusably
ignorant.

I just love the Schoolmarm lessons that inevitably follow. Priceless.



Mark.
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

Reply via email to