> > Right, but emphasize that the granularity is a signing domain -- it is > > not and cannot be a way to attribute mail to individual people. > > > > Unless you have reason to believe that the signer is taking steps to ensure > that the sender information is accurate. I'd say that a DKIM signature from > a reputable service provider would quite likely increase the *chance* that > the sender information is accurate. Of course, you can't be certain (with > any technology), because any account might be compromised by phishing.
Why isn't a signed 822.From sufficiently accurate sender information from a provider who cares? Mark. _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html
