On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 7:40 AM, Thomas Narten <nar...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> What is needed is someone who is fully engaged in the IAOC. > > Having a vote doesn't automatically get you that. Indeed, I would > assume most votes are a formality, with decisions reached mostly by > consensus. Both the IAOC and the Trust do in practice run on consensus. I believe that the number of close votes, in the entire history of both organizations, could be counted on the figure of one hand. Regards Marshall > If, in fact, votes are close on a regular basis, the IAOC > likely has bigger problems, IMO. > > Seems to me that having an I* chair vote is designed to force them to > pay attention and be accountable. > > The key quesion, IMO, is whether it is acceptable to have an I* chair > offload the responsibility for paying attention and being engaged. > > I'm hearing some say "yes" and others say "no". > > Thomas > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf >
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
