Yes, but why limit to one other product only - would it be too broad to suggest that we are interested in all OS technology including things like Simputer?
The BSD liscense is considered to be freer - it is more conducive to being accepted by commercial ventures. That's all my ignorant self can recall. raja Soumyadip Modak wrote: > I was thinking : why don't we broaden our views and instead of > concentrating on Linux only, why don't we start supporting the BSD > versions of unix also ? i know many might be castigating me for > suggesting this on a *linux* user group, but i believe that BSD and > Linux arean excellent example of freedom of choice that open source > software affords us. > > Another query : is open source software equivalent to software under the > GNU public license ? > > Soumyadip Modak > RCCIIT,Kolkata > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -- > To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body > "unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line. > FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/help/faq_list.html > > -- Raja Guha --------- Frobnitz, pl. Frobnitzem (frob'nitsm) n.: An unspecified physical object, a widget. Also refers to electronic black boxes. This rare form is usually abbreviated to FROTZ, or more commonly to FROB. Also used are FROBNULE, FROBULE, and FROBNODULE. Starting perhaps in 1979, FROBBOZ (fruh-bahz'), pl. FROBBOTZIM, has also become very popular, largely due to its exposure via the Adventure spin-off called Zork (Dungeon). These can also be applied to non-physical objects, such as data structures. -- To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body "unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line. FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/help/faq_list.html
