K. Ghosh wrote:

On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 04:17:38 +0530
"A. Mani" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:



Soumya wrote:



RMS says Free as in Freedom - that's MUKTO.

Free as in Market may be said as NIRDAAM (newly coined)





No, that means something else. ... in prakrit ..."to sleep".



Would'nt that be NIDRAM ? Soumya's word is NIRDAM, see position of R & D
Maybe NIRDAAM would be better from pronounciation.....


Doubt Everything




-- K.Ghosh 093 910 58 749 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Debian GNU/Linux user No.301508

--
To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body
"unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line.
FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/node.php?id=3



hello list,
perhaps, "nirdaam" and "nihshulka" both contain the market aspect more, and
although "mukto" has a suggestion of openness but that again refers to
market (free vs. open source).
few days ago there was a thread posted in fsf-friends, 'economic aspects
of FLOSS'. that may be a good reference of *freedom as in free market*.
question remains, how do we prefer to call it, commodity or concept? like 'free' part of 'freedom' when appended with 'software' which can only be conceptualised as a commodity, we get, a 'hansjaru' with 'haate roilo pencil'.
if not contextualized, being commited to the origin of a word may not serve that good


what about *(a)mulya*?
reference:  '.....amulya bale a-mulye nen' - kaji najrul
the term may contain/carry
1. the social potential of value addition by free software and so the
interrelation between 'information society' and its physical counterpart
can be addressed
2. the 'mukto' aspect in 'free market' (value vs. price)
3. the patent disputes and the question of copyright (derived from the
question of value and price)
still, yet to coin it in a fashion to incorporate the flavor of the
collective/community aspect of the whole thing.


regards, sraaban


-- To unsubscribe, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the body "unsubscribe ilug-cal" and an empty subject line. FAQ: http://www.ilug-cal.org/node.php?id=3

Reply via email to