Right now my SMTPD32 service is using up around 8.5 megs of memory.  I
will check again later when the server load is higher and see if that
has gone up any.  We didn't have any problems yesterday though, so I
think my strategy of paring down the Declude dnsbl's and filters might
have worked well enough. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Nice
> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 3:14 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] No Message Body
> 
> 
> Dan,
>    We are also running 1.82.    If your SMTPd process is 
> using more than 50 
> MB RAM, restarting the service may correct both problems.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dan Horne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 9:34 AM
> Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] No Message Body
> 
> 
> That sounds right.  We are using 8.2 HF2 also.  We have already gone
> back to Declude 1.82 a few weeks ago.  Actually that may coincide with
> when I started seeing these messages.... Hmm... Something to think
> about.  What version of Declude are you running?
> 
> Anyway all day yesterday when I would look at task manager there would
> be 15-20 Declude processes running.  I did some global.cfg surgery
> trying to weed out the less effective dnsbl and filter tests. 
>  I figure
> that the dnsbl tests are most likely the reason for the extended
> lifetime of the Declude processes, and the filter files are the most
> likely culprits for higher resource usage.  I'm extremely 
> hesitant to go
> back up to 2.06, but I may try it out for a day.
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> List Archive: 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
> Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
> 

To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to