|
I would say you need to think about multiple machines
anyway instead of trying to do everything on one. One thing goes wrong
and you're completely hosed. William Van Hefner wrote: Need for growing resources??? If this isn't an option, you'll pretty much have to get rid of Microsoft-compatible products altogether. Since when have you seen any Microsoft OS or app get smaller, more efficient (or cheaper) over time? I think it's a given that most large companies that write Microsoft compatible software care more about ease of use and features than speed, efficiency or even good code writing. Symantec is probably the worst example of this philosophy. Every year their software becomes more and more bloated, hogs more resources and doesn't really come with any real improvements to speak of.William Van Hefner Network Administrator Vantek Communications, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
- RE: [IMail Forum] Rollback to 8.2 William Van Hefner
- Re: [IMail Forum] Rollback to 8.2 Matrosity Hosting
- RE: [IMail Forum] Rollback to 8.2 Kenneth Nutt
- Re: [IMail Forum] Rollback to 8... Tripp Allen
- RE: [IMail Forum] Rollback ... Robert E. Spivack
- Re: [IMail Forum] Rollb... Bonno Bloksma
- Re[2]: [IMail Foru... Sanford Whiteman
- RE: [IMail Forum] Rollback to 8.2 Jay Sudowski - Handy Networks LLC
