I think it would be even cleaner if they just had a filter definition which specifically look for attachments, and then you did the rest of the filter. I suggest -A Attachment -x for Extension then you can filter as needed........this would eliminate the ones which have the words within the body but are not really attachments. Gerry At 02:22 PM 5/19/00 -0400, Madscientist wrote: >I keep asking IPSwitch to include a tag in the header of messages that are >redirected by their rules so that we can look at the header and see which >rule fired to move the message. That would really clear up this confusion, >and would help when fixing rules that catch things we don't want to catch. Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list.
- Re: [IMail Forum] problem wi... Madscientist
- RE: [IMail Forum] problem wi... Dan Spangenberg
- Re: [IMail Forum] problem wi... Gary Cook
- RE: [IMail Forum] problem wi... Dan Spangenberg
- RE: [IMail Forum] problem wi... Tyran Ormond
- Re: [IMail Forum] problem wi... Madscientist
- RE: [IMail Forum] problem wi... Dan Spangenberg
- Re: [IMail Forum] problem wi... Tyran Ormond
- Re: [IMail Forum] problem wi... Gordon Williams
- Re[2]: [IMail Forum] problem... Roger Heath
- Re: [IMail Forum] problem wi... Gerry Dalton
- Re: [IMail Forum] problem wi... Madscientist
- Re: [IMail Forum] problem wi... Cal Frye
- [IMail Forum] Blocking ALL attachments Gordon Williams
- Re: [IMail Forum] Blocking ALL attachments Virtual Web Servers
- Re: [IMail Forum] Blocking ALL attachments Gordon Williams
- RE: [IMail Forum] Another virus. Rand Thacker
- RE: [IMail Forum] Another virus. Rand Thacker
