That might also eliminate another filtering bug where some encoded
attachments are able to trigger unrelated rules just by pure luck... because
some portion of the encoded text matches a rule for an unrelated class of
email. - rare, but it does happen.
----- Original Message -----
From: Gerry Dalton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 19, 2000 09:32
Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] problem with rules.ima
> I think it would be even cleaner if they just had a filter definition
which
> specifically look for attachments, and then you did the rest of the
> filter. I suggest -A Attachment -x for Extension then you can filter as
> needed........this would eliminate the ones which have the words within
the
> body but are not really attachments.
>
>
> Gerry
>
> At 02:22 PM 5/19/00 -0400, Madscientist wrote:
> >I keep asking IPSwitch to include a tag in the header of messages that
are
> >redirected by their rules so that we can look at the header and see which
> >rule fired to move the message. That would really clear up this
confusion,
> >and would help when fixing rules that catch things we don't want to
catch.
>
>
> Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> to be removed from this list.
>
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
