On 03:56 PM 05/19/2000 -0400, it would appear that Madscientist wrote:
>I have had a theory... as yet unproven... that mal-formed rules can preclude
>the evaluation of other rules in the file... There have been cases where I
>thought this was going on, but the failure seemed to be intermittent so I
>was not able to isolate it.
>_M
Doesn't apply in our case. B~filename="numerous strings designed to grab v
b s files":virus was rule # 316 and never caught a thing. B~\pv b s:virus
is also rule #316 and it has caught every occurrence of v b s whether an
attached file or another "warning" to our users (these are becoming so
numerous as to almost be considered SPAM at this point).
Tyran Ormond
LAN Technician/Programmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
