forgive, allow me to consider all the ramifications of text.
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott Phelps
> >Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 9:18 AM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: RE: Re(2): [IMail Forum] imail issue
> >
> >
> >
> >Your candor isn't nearly as annoying as your penchant for HTML formatted
> >mail.
> >
> >______________________________________
> >splehP ttocS
> >rotartsinimdA smetsyS TN
> >secivreS tenretnI renroKbeW
> >moc.renrokbew@pttocs
> >moc.renrokbew.www
> >
> >$a="@ARGV";while($a){$a=~s/(.$)//;$b=$b.$1;}print "$b\n";
> >______________________________________
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Patrick Mathews
> >Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 8:45 AM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: RE: Re(2): [IMail Forum] imail issue
> >
> >
> >post rebukes and flames openly on the forum please, i do not
> >usually respond
> >off the list. i'm only a 'useless list troll' if i'm off topic
> >consistently,
> >or abusive, i Will get TOSsed. ipswitch will be faithful to
> >protect you from
> >the likes of me.
> >
> >faithful are the wounds of a friend, the kisses of an enemy are deceit.
> >
> >hatred for my weird style elicits all kinds of responses. from
> >this i winnow
> >the best responses from those whose personal 'noise filters' don't block
> >content.
> >
> >what does this mean? if i flag your noise filter, you likely are
> >too young
> >or inexperienced to have anything for me. if you are in management or
> >marketing, my chatty excessively personal writing style is
> >designed to get
> >you to 'see my name and delete me immediately'. i'm in lot's of peoples
> >filters.
> >
> >i want that.
> >
> >reasons below: follow the personal link for a real lecture on
> >the subject, i
> >can talk with my hands too, you'll see. actually if you follow the thread
> >from the beginning, you'll see that it was an attempt to get off the orbs
> >thread. i got an excellent answer from support, and this morn have
> >determined where to start a security analysis of LDAP and AD.
> >
> >any group of people, like-minded or not is a social group necessarily.
> >
> >like doesn't have anything to do with information.
> >
> >i waste bandwidth with noise, this is ok, if your problem is
> >mission crit,
> >you should be calling or emailing support. most of my troubles aren't so
> >huge.
> >
> >why am i so curious about just one of my many apps?
> >
> >i don't understand AD (active directory). i've been trying to
> >understand AD
> >by studying it directly for a year and a half now. i've given
> >up, and i'm
> >trying to determine it's characteristics based on it's impact, yes, it's
> >effect on a product that i've run successfully without the AD.
> >
> >Ms. Metre: forgive my arrogant stupidity, i'm blind: i cannot
> >see the wind
> >the way everyone else tells me that they 'see' it. i don't
> >understand them
> >and i've never been able to relate to normal socialized
> >enfranchised members
> >of our society because of this, i only see the wind's effect.
> >that's why i
> >believe in the wind, not because i claim to see it, but i see
> >what it does.
> >
> >i lecture on the subject here:
> >www.patmathews.net/1.avi
> >
> >please listen and then call the authorities, i doubt that i'm
> >really worthy
> >of normal social interaction with the society that produces vietnam,
> >watergate, survivor, littleton, mcveigh, kacinsky, disgruntled worker
> >syndrome or white collar criminals et al. i'm not worthy. i see
> >it it other
> >peoples eyes, especially corporate mgmt and market droids. i'm damaged
> >goods. foster care, hatred, etc.
> >i'm emotionally disturbed, i don't medicate against medical
> >advice. i'm no
> >danger to myself or anyone else, but this life causes me to weep often.
> >
> >i, being substandard than they can only produce what you hear in the avi.
> >please forgive me. i'll try to be better, but i don't understand
> >the things
> >that normal people seem to already understand most times.
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Susan Metre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >Sent: Thursday, June 07, 2001 1:47 AM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: RE: Re(2): [IMail Forum] imail issue
> >
> >
> >Jibberish and waste of email processing. Join a social list.
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Patrick Mathews
> >Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 11:54 PM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: Re(2): [IMail Forum] imail issue
> >
> >
> >m$ doctrine is that AD is LDAP enabled, my original question obscurely
> >stated by a desire to entertain was:
> >
> >who needs ldap anyway.... i just don't have your gift of putting it
> >succinctly. now, d3 is checking for me, he's with the band, see? but not
> >officially, he just babysits and makes sure that the salesmen
> >also provide
> >us good bits here.
> >
> >i expect to raise this issue with our web guy and router guy. i
> >don't really
> >speak to much router or web, my limited talent and experience
> >relegate me to
> >the lowly role of board and drive swapper and all around server geek. so
> >there! a left handed concurrence sir, never let it be said that
> >i said "Me
> >too" in a mere 2 words!! i have a reputation to protect.
> >
> >signed,
> >paddy mcblarney
> >low priest of quantum verbosity
> >thanks for all the fiche- d.adams revised
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: Imail
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 05:27 PM
> >Subject: Re: Re(2): [IMail Forum] imail issue
> >
> >
> >I don't even enable the service. No need. No desire. No point.
> >
> >Who needs LDAP anyway?
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: Patrick Mathews
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 3:19 PM
> >Subject: RE: Re(2): [IMail Forum] imail issue
> >
> >
> >life is indeed bleak. there is NO moderator. this is anarchy at
> >it's finest.
> >action is the only solution for entropy. ergo, i'm created,
> >therefore i am,
> >cuz most times if i thought, i wouldn't be wondering if i was.
> >those of us who want one outcome or another need to act consistently with
> >our desires:
> >i have a question that has been bothering me about LDAP and Imail:
> >this is not mission crit, but maybe we can waste some cycles on
> >an academic
> >issue. i migrated 5k plus users from a reliable linux config that was
> >upstream from me, good config on their boxes, solid: but the upstream
> >providor in that direction was dicey and unresponsive. my users had down
> >time. this cannot be.
> >i'm not your LDAP guru, in fact: what's an LDAP? wrong list,
> >i'll ask around
> >elsewhere, point i'm making is: p136 in the manual (being stupid i read
> >manuals, it helps mitigate my stupidity) tells me that if i do what i did
> >(and i did) that i may want to populate the ldap directory. does
> >this mean
> >that my 6500 hippies, yuppies, and farmers now are able to see
> >server side
> >info on the client side? there's some things they don't really
> >need to know
> >about each other...
> >Rants, war stories, flames and links appreciated.
> >As Self Appointed List Troll (ol s.a.l.t.) i say that if empty
> >hands are a
> >devils workshop... what's an empty mind? his kitchen! someone
> >learn me ova
> >heah, hah?
> >
> >
> >Help other Ipswitch users as they help you. We believe in our
> >customer base,
> >and we think by letting you share ideas all of us can benefit.
> >These e-mail
> >discussion lists are for you to share tips and tricks for using our
> >products.
> >The e-mail lists are unmoderated, but we do read them and will
> >occasionally
> >send our own comments. People who send offensive or abusive
> >messages will be
> >barred from the list.
> >These mailing lists were created with our own IMail Server's List Server
> >module. For more information, visit the IMail Server Product Page
> >List Subscription Form
> >
> >Your Name*:
> >Your E-Mail Address*:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> >From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Anderson
> >Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 4:13 PM
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mark McDonald
> >Subject: Re(2): [IMail Forum] ORBS IS DEAD! LETS GET ON WITH
> >IMAIL BUSINESS!
> >
> >
> >Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
> >to be removed from this list.
> >
> >An Archive of this list is available at:
> >http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
> >
Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
to be removed from this list.
An Archive of this list is available at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
