The response was wrt a "why run imail on W2K Server when Pro will do" comment.
The MS W2K Pro license is very clear on the W2K connection limit. The McAfee license may be arguable. Jerry ----- Original Message ----- From: "IMail Admin at BC Web" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 5:13 PM Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] setup McAfee on IMail server with Declude > Licensing is a good point, and we do try to be careful of that. However, > it's not clear to me that the number of connections (or anything related to > networking) has any relevance when we're using only the DOS scanner on files > stored on the local hard drive. > > It's an interesting OT question about licensing. In general, protecting the > rights of software developers is appropriate, but I've seen a lot of stuff > put into licenses (not to mention the very way in which people "agree" to > licenses) that is questionable. Unfortunately, it may be a long time before > this stuff gets tested thoroughly in court, or before we have a judiciary > system that understands technology. > > The best way to avoid all of these problems with McAfee, of course, is to > pick someone else. Norton won't work because they don't provide a DOS > scanner. Are there any other good AV products with command-line scanners? > > Ben > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jerry Murdock" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 1:55 PM > Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] setup McAfee on IMail server with Declude > > > > Staying legal would be the primary reason to run Server over Pro. If you > > ever have more than 10 connections into your imail box then you are not in > > compliance with the Pro license. > > > > Jerry > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Robert Haskett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 3:01 PM > > Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] setup McAfee on IMail server with Declude > > > > > > > Is there a reason you run Imail on W2K Advanced Server? Imail doesn't > need > > > W2K Server to run. Our Imail server runs on W2K Pro which is alot > cheaper > > > than Server, doesn't require seat licenses and doesn't have all the > nasty > > > internet security problems of IIS. Just curious. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > > to be removed from this list. > > > > An Archive of this list is available at: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > > > > > Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html > to be removed from this list. > > An Archive of this list is available at: > http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ > Please visit http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html to be removed from this list. An Archive of this list is available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
