|
I have
a question about this practice. Why would you block the whole range
without verifying that the entire range is used for spamming? Our company
only has 5 static IPs. We don't need any more than that. But if a
spammer were to use another IP in the block our IPs are in, we become an
innocent victim. I thought anti-spam efforts were to prevent email users
from becoming innocent victims, of spammers. Now I see that I need to
protect our company from the anti-spammers. Its like being a nuetral
country in the middle of a war.
Now I
realize that its easier to blacklist the entire IP block, but its even easier to
shut down your mail server! And both will protect you from a spammer on
the IP block. So I suggest you do the later and save the rest of us!
This is sounding very much like AOL, et al. And I have to think you know
how I feel about there gustapo practices.
Todd
|
- [IMail Forum] Help with getting unlisted on anti-spam DB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [IMail Forum] Help with getting unlisted on ant... R. Scott Perry
- Re[2]: [IMail Forum] Help with getting unlisted... Roger Heath
- Re: [IMail Forum] Help with getting unlisted on... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- RE: [IMail Forum] Help with getting unlisted on ant... Rick Leske
- RE: [IMail Forum] Help with getting unlisted on... Todd Holt
- RE: [IMail Forum] Help with getting unliste... Bruce Clark
- RE: [IMail Forum] Help with getting unl... Todd Holt
- RE: [IMail Forum] Help with gettin... R. Scott Perry
- RE: [IMail Forum] Help with getting unliste... Rick Leske
- Re: [IMail Forum] Help with getting unl... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [IMail Forum] Help with getting unlisted on... [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: [IMail Forum] Help with getting unliste... Rick Leske
- RE: [IMail Forum] Help with getting unl... Visual Web Norge
