If you have a gateway available, why not simply dump off all deliveries to
it and allow your IMail box to concentrate on user support?

_M

]-----Original Message-----
]From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of MJC1
]Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 8:41 AM
]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
]Subject: RE: [IMail Forum] Maximum list recipients
]
]
]Your message gave me an idea:
]
]How about if I set the primary IMAIL server to try 1 time before sending
]mail through a remote gateway?
]
]Wouldn't that speed up delivery? There must be an SMTP connection timeout
]setting where the timeout could
]be lessened to say 10 seconds so that faster servers would receive the
]messages and the remote gateway would
]send to the slower servers?
]
]-----Original Message-----
]From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of R. Scott Perry
]Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 8:01 AM
]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
]Subject: Re: [IMail Forum] Maximum list recipients
]
]
]
]>According to the IMAIL manual, you are supposed
]>to divide the total number of recipients by 25
]>and enter that in as the "messages per process."
]>
]>Our list is 150,000 addresses so won't 6000 messages
]>per process basically put the server on it's knees?
]
]No.  It means that you'll have 25 processes, each serially sending out
]6,000 E-mails.  So if the first 100 E-mails are to mailservers that are on
]slow connections and each take 60 seconds to process, it will be 2 hours
]before IMail starts working on the other 5,900 E-mails.
]
]>We're going to upgrade the SMTP server but would like to continue using
]>Windows & Imail for this job.
]>
]>There must be a more concrete way to establish the requirements
]>(hardware/software specifications) for sending to a list of this size?
]>
]>I'm assuming there are folks out there who use IMAIL
]>successfully to send to 150,000+ lists?
]
]It's not easy to do.  One option is to use our Declude Queue (which is
]built into all the Declude programs, including the free Declude
]Confirm).  If you send in batches of less than 6,000 recipients per message
](as most people end up doing), Declude Queue would help speed up the
]delivery (as it makes sure that IMail is sending at its maximum
]capacity).  But, it still isn't going to get the E-mail out fast, as you
]are still limited to about 30 parallel processes.
]
]We have been doing some work with an experimental program that is designed
]exactly for a situation like this, a "lazy mailer" that will intercept the
]E-mail to the list, and try each address once.  If the delivery can be
]accomplished easily without re-queueing, it will be done (if not, it will
]get sent to IMail for later delivery).  This wouldn't have any process (or
]even thread) limitations, so it could easily have 1,000 or more E-mails
]being processed in parallel.
]
]                                                    -Scott
]---
]Declude JunkMail: The advanced anti-spam solution for IMail mailservers.
]Declude Virus: Catches both viruses and vulnerabilities in E-mail, with no
]annual licensing fees.
]
]---
][This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus
](http://www.declude.com)]
]
]
]To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
]List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
]Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
]
]
]
]
]To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
]List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
]Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
]


To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/

Reply via email to