What made you think that Kami doesn't accept <> senders?
What made you think I think that?
He's referring to the inane challenge/response "confirmation" version of sender address verification and the havoc it wreaks on automated systems. He's not referring to envelope-only verification.
but his "are not supposed (?) to send any emails to it" could have indicated that the sender address doesn't accept bounces either (as well as not being able to participate in challenge/response sessions) which gives him problems with IMGate/posfix-type sender_address_verification
Knowing this
you know what you know, I know what I know, stop pretending that you know what I know.
, I expect you'll understand that Kami should not be attacked
I can answer any email in this forum in any style I please.
but defended for having to deal with (as so many have) the flaws of such a system.
If Kami confirm his sender address, refuses bounces, the basic flaw IS with his system.
Len
_____________________________________________________________________ http://MenAndMice.com/DNS-training: Denver; New York; Seattle IMGate.MEIway.com: anti-spam gateway, effective on 1000's of sites, free
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
