>>"Not accepting bounces makes you look just like tons of spammers." >> >> -Len Conrad to Kami Razvan
> ... has nothing to do AT ALL with null senders. Not accepting bounces has *nothing* to do with rejecting null senders? *Nothing* to do at all? Uh...huh. I'll wait to see that on your 'Len's Hints' page. Wait, though: you might be embarrassed there in front of your PostFix constituency, so you can just post that kind of thing here, where we Windozers apparently won't notice your evasive tactics once you've been corrected for the umpteenth time. Take your fight to Bill Gates, since your real gripe seems to be that you can't convert the whole Windows community with sharp talk and all-lowercase trolls. You can't reject null senders for particular recipients in Ipswitch IMail Server (that's the product we use here--maybe you've heard of it). Therefore, rejecting *all* null senders--which of course has *always* been intimately related to bounce acceptance, despite the above silly claim to the contrary which should make all of us mail admins perplexed at your historical competence--is the *only* way to have the situation you thought Kami had: "not accepting bounces." Therefore, since one assumes on the *IMail* Forum that posters understand that the questions are about IMail...well, you put that together. > with no contribution from you, to MY exchange with KAMI, he > confirmed that his sender address does accept inbound mail. He only needed to "confirm" it to you because you never, ever read carefully. It was clear from his post (to people that take the time to read) that THAT WASN'T WHAT HE WAS TALKING ABOUT. > Why was it confirmed off list? Was it perhaps that his post was open to > more than one interpretation? I used the term "off-list" because I sent a note apologizing to Kami for the list's (i.e. your) rude behavior and explaining that your misconstruing of his post was at fault, not his server configuration, and that he should not shy away from the thread after your attack. In fact, it was "confirmed" within his original message, which was perfectly clear. > congratulations, your are your own best, fan. But, WTF does that > have to with the exchange I am having with Kami? In an "exchange," or, as you call it elsewhere, a "dialogue," you don't tell the person (1) "It's your nightmare"; (2) "Your error"; (3) a "false problem"; (4) "stop making your error." In an exchange, you read for content instead of attacking, you help the person with the issue they have--not one they don't have, in fact *can't* have--and you apologize for your errors. What you posted, on the other hand, was a tirade, baseless, and useless to Kami's issue. I posted the exact information that Kami was seeking--after all, I do actually *use* IMail, unlike you--while you were three-deep into your own posts before you finally figured out Kami's first. Then, at last, the coup de grace: Len doesn't like challenge/response. I was on the edge of my seat waiting to see if you'd ever figure out the situation--but then, to my pleasure, you had an *opinion* about it, too! Bravo! -Sandy ------------------------------------ Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist Broadleaf Systems, a division of Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc. e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/ Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
