> What made you think I think that?
"Not accepting bounces makes you look just like tons of spammers."
-Len Conrad to Kami Razvan
"RFC requires that an envelope sender accept bounce msgs to the
envelope sender as recipient, so you are in violation of RFCs."
-Len Conrad to Kami Razvan
"Your error is causing problems for your clients who are hassling
their mail admins. Stop making your error and give everybody else a
break."
-Len Conrad to Kami Razvan
Ample reason there--or were these quotes munged somewhere between your
client and mine? Is some third-party provocateur out there trying to
start a fight by using your Reply-To:?
> you know what you know, I know what I know, stop pretending that you know
> what I know.
I read his post absolutely correctly, confirmed off-list. I also
tested his mail server, something you didn't bother to do. You leapt
to conclusions, then at his throat, just as you're doing to me.
> I can answer any email in this forum in any style I please.
Yes, anyone can troll.
> If Kami confirm his sender address, refuses bounces, the basic flaw
> IS with his system.
The problems are (1) with challenge/response, and (2) with your
professionalism.
-Sandy
------------------------------------
Sanford Whiteman, Chief Technologist
Broadleaf Systems, a division of
Cypress Integrated Systems, Inc.
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
------------------------------------
To Unsubscribe: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/mailing-lists.html
List Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/imail_forum%40list.ipswitch.com/
Knowledge Base/FAQ: http://www.ipswitch.com/support/IMail/
