> W. Wayne Liauh wrote: > > I think the job No. 1 is for those involved to > explain why we have to use IIIM? Why Sun is the only > company on earth who is still sticking with IIIMf? > Have the decision-makers considered other options, > such as SCIM, which has become the default IM in > Linux? Has anyone done any comparisons (performance > and utility) of IIIM vs SCIM? And perhaps most > importantly, why Chinese users despise IIIM? > Wayne, I think you're exaggerating just a bit too > much with that "on > earth" part. > > There are still companies supporting distributions > that use IIIM and Sun > is one of them. While I understand that many have > switched to SCIM or > some other alternative, that is irrelevant. > > I respect that you believe better alternatives are > available, but you > have not presented your arguments in an appropriate > manner. > > I'm also puzzled as to why you're asking questions > addressed to Sun on > opensolaris.org. Perhaps you should speak with > customer support at Sun. > > This is the wrong list for your request. > > -- > Shawn Walker
You are absolutely right. If Ms. Lin Lee of Sun doesn't care, why should we give it a damn? -- This message posted from opensolaris.org _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
