W. Wayne Liauh wrote: >> W. Wayne Liauh wrote: >>> I think the job No. 1 is for those involved to >> explain why we have to use IIIM? Why Sun is the only >> company on earth who is still sticking with IIIMf? >> Have the decision-makers considered other options, >> such as SCIM, which has become the default IM in >> Linux? Has anyone done any comparisons (performance >> and utility) of IIIM vs SCIM? And perhaps most >> importantly, why Chinese users despise IIIM? >> Wayne, I think you're exaggerating just a bit too >> much with that "on >> earth" part. >> >> There are still companies supporting distributions >> that use IIIM and Sun >> is one of them. While I understand that many have >> switched to SCIM or >> some other alternative, that is irrelevant. >> >> I respect that you believe better alternatives are >> available, but you >> have not presented your arguments in an appropriate >> manner. >> >> I'm also puzzled as to why you're asking questions >> addressed to Sun on >> opensolaris.org. Perhaps you should speak with >> customer support at Sun. >> >> This is the wrong list for your request. >> >> -- >> Shawn Walker > > You are absolutely right. If Ms. Lin Lee of Sun doesn't care, why should we > give it a damn?
If you want OpenSolaris to adopt a new input method, you should be discussing it on the relevant lists here and addressing it to the community, not Sun. I have never known project members in the community (regardless of who they work for) to reject well-presented and reasonably worded suggestions. Perhaps a different approach would better suited to accomplishing your goals? -- Shawn Walker _______________________________________________ indiana-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/indiana-discuss
