Thank you sir.
As a final note, I would make sure to shoot with a scale next time so that
atleast a few doubts arising as a result of no scale measurements can be
avoided!

On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 12:20 AM, surajit koley <
[email protected]> wrote:

> No Sir Anurag Ji, I am unable to tell you if the capsules in your thread
> are pubescent or not!
> That is why I think the KEY from your college taxonomy club doesn't help
> me much in these cases!
>
> Not only that, according to the KEY of that book *H. neilgherryensis* should
> have glandular hairy cladodes. I am not sure if those cladodes in your
> plant
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/D5V4vxlW5nc/5q0B7fF9oQ0J>
> were glandular or not. Perhaps a few glandular hairs are there
> in DSC_0739.jpg (below the flower) and in DSC_0743.jpg (bottom of the pic).
>
> In fact, this prolonged and intermittent discussion along with so many KEY
> in various sources makes it more and more complicated.
>
> Yet, based on distribution,your species is not *plumosa*; based on hair
> on cladodes your species is not *tentaculatus*; based on this thread
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/3nmuGlKjTcA/_NfYckzYZxwJ>
> your species is not * verticillatus*.
>
> Thank you
> Regards
>
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Anurag Sharma <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> No sir, I am afraid without a clear view of the capsules, I wouldn't know
>> where to start.
>> But in this thread
>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/indiantreepix/D5V4vxlW5nc/5q0B7fF9oQ0J>,
>> would you say that the capsule is pubescent or glabrous?
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:03 PM, surajit koley <
>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Anurag Ji for the KEY to four species. But, does it help us to
>>> identify the species we/I have discussed so far in the following three
>>> threads? -
>>>
>>>    1.
>>>    https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/q8x3X5TrbrY/9LAisyYhIHwJ 
>>> (this
>>>    very thread)
>>>    2.
>>>    https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/D5V4vxlW5nc/5q0B7fF9oQ0J
>>>    3.
>>>    https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/By2tCca-aOs/niDaDdPIZU8J
>>>
>>> Would you please identify the above threads again?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> surajit
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Anurag Sharma <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Good evening sir. While going through the various flora in my college
>>>> taxonomy lab, I found this in the Flora of Nasik District (P.
>>>> Lakshminarasimhan and B.D Sharma). All four species have been keyed out:
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Anurag Sharma <[email protected]
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Thank you very much sir- for the discussion and the summary!
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 10:37 PM, surajit koley <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Anurag Ji, following is the synopsis (based on very limited
>>>>>> resource we have discussed and pasted links) -
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *cladode length :-*
>>>>>> *verticillaris* (*verticillatus* ) = 19 mm to 30 mm
>>>>>> *tentaculatus* (incl. var.) = 06 mm to 20 mm
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *glandular hairs on cladodes :*
>>>>>> *verticillaris* (*verticillatus* ) = present
>>>>>> *tentaculatus* (incl. var.) = absent (in all var.?)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *calyx :*
>>>>>> *verticillaris* (*verticillatus* ) = 2 mm long, glabrous or pubescent
>>>>>> *tentaculatus* =
>>>>>>
>>>>>>    - (around 4 to 5 mm long, pubescent or scarcely ciliate in var.
>>>>>>    *tentaculatus*
>>>>>>    - long (? should be more or less equal to above) and pilose in
>>>>>>    *neilgherryensis* (note : spike is congested than var.
>>>>>>    *tentaculatus*)
>>>>>>    - should be equal length to above and plumose in var. *plumosa*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (please note KEW has herb. featuring intermediate form of var.
>>>>>> *tentaculatus* and var. *neilgherryensis*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *colour of corolla :-*
>>>>>> uncertain to me in all species and var.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Capsule size also uncertain (ref. JCB & Pullaiah); number of seeds
>>>>>> not known to me; seed of *tentaculatus* is smaller than
>>>>>> *verticillaris* (ref. FBI)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Anurag Sharma <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have a request sir.
>>>>>>> Could you please summarize our entire discussion so as to be
>>>>>>> referred to in the future when another post of Haplanthodes sp. comes 
>>>>>>> up?
>>>>>>> This would be quite helpful for me as well.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:29 AM, surajit koley <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> btw, Calyx of *H. verticillaris* is 1 line (1 line = 2.1 mm).
>>>>>>>> corolla 6 line long (note the calyx to corolla ratio); calyx glabrous 
>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>> nearly so (ref.
>>>>>>>> http://www.herbier-mpu.org/zoomify/zoomify.php?fichier=MPU018249).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:13 AM, surajit koley <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Our concern is with only two species of FBI, Anurag Ji, *Haplanthus
>>>>>>>>> verticillaris* and *H. tentaculatus*. The later includes var.
>>>>>>>>> *nilgherrensis* and var. *plumosa*.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Since I have no field experience on this particular genus I depend
>>>>>>>>> on DInesh Ji's experience - of *H. neilgherryensis* -
>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/NbKZ2cRILsc/znbfFPnQ7iAJ
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I have collected info from various threads, examined online
>>>>>>>>> herbarium, read old lit. and cooked my own recipe. I do not claim my 
>>>>>>>>> dish
>>>>>>>>> is healthy and nutritious!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>> surajit
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:09 AM, Anurag Sharma <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks sir.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> One question- are the pseudowhorls forming further branches not
>>>>>>>>>> seen ANY of the other threads on the group?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 9:56 PM, surajit koley <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Anurag Ji,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If *Haplanthus verticillaris* Nees can have 3 teeth sometimes
>>>>>>>>>>> then number of teeth won't be a KEY to id species. Attached here 
>>>>>>>>>>> what Wight
>>>>>>>>>>> recorded about cladode teeth in *H. nilgherrensis*. Please note
>>>>>>>>>>> what Wight referred to "bract" may be he meant cladode.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> After going through all uploads of *Haplanthus*/*Haplanthodes* I
>>>>>>>>>>> think -
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>    - length cladode is vital (ref. FBI and "note" in
>>>>>>>>>>>    http://linnean-online.org/6882/)
>>>>>>>>>>>    - I am not sure if presence/absence of glandular hair can be
>>>>>>>>>>>    a KEY
>>>>>>>>>>>    - In *H. neilgherryensis* flowers in pseudo-whorls taking a
>>>>>>>>>>>    form of terminal spike; cladodes and sepals with white hairs 
>>>>>>>>>>> (ref. FBI)
>>>>>>>>>>>    - In var. *plumosa* pseudo-whorls are relatively wide
>>>>>>>>>>>    spaced; sepals are hairy subplumose
>>>>>>>>>>>    - In *H. tentacularis* cladodes are smaller than *H.
>>>>>>>>>>>    verticillaris* and not ciliate (ref. FBI and Linnean site)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> However, I think I have found *H. t.* var. *plumosa*! Here it
>>>>>>>>>>> is -
>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/By2tCca-aOs/niDaDdPIZU8J.
>>>>>>>>>>> Check the two photographs in highest resolution, you will see 
>>>>>>>>>>> plumose
>>>>>>>>>>> sepals clearly. Besides, each pseudo-whorl in that plant gives rise 
>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> sub-branches which do again form flowering pseudowhorl of cladodes 
>>>>>>>>>>> (Dinesh
>>>>>>>>>>> Ji pointed out this character in a thread). Please also compare 
>>>>>>>>>>> those two
>>>>>>>>>>> pics with another upload(s) by Neil Sir -
>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/CCj373r5vGw/GrD_qNzUKkEJ
>>>>>>>>>>>  Note
>>>>>>>>>>> the darker pattern in corolla lobes in both the thread
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Anurag Sharma <
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Well sir, in one Flora that I saw, it said cladodes in H.
>>>>>>>>>>>> verticillatus generally 2 toothed, rarely 3. I cannot find it 
>>>>>>>>>>>> right now.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Will attach when I do.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:25 PM, surajit koley <
>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anurag Ji,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I copy here the KEY, based on various lit, you have provided -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *CHARACTER*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Haplanthus verticillaris* Nees
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Haplanthodes verticillatus* (Roxb.) R.B.Majumdar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Haplanthus neilgherryensis *Wight
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Haplanthodes nilgherrensis* (Wight) R.B.Majumdar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> (this column can include the varieties coming under*Haplanthodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tentaculatus- Haplanthus tentaculatus*group)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *INFLORESCENCE*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> TERMINAL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *CLADODE*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> .75-1.25 INCH
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ENDING IN 2 SPINOUS TEETH
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> VILLOUS AND GLANDULAR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> .5 INCH
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ENDING IN 2 OR MORE TEETH
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> VILLOUS (NOT GLANDULAR)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *CAPSULE*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> .4 INCH
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> GLABROUS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> .2 INCH
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> PUBESCENT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *SEEDS*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6-16
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please check the thread
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/C6E9D20qujk/x1u7YD85F60J.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> To me cladodes seem to be gladular, yet number of teeth is two in 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> some &
>>>>>>>>>>>>> three in others. What do you think?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:59 PM, surajit koley <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anurag Ji,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I do not know. Since we do not have other source we will have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to depend on FBI. I copy a few words -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Type species : cladodes in fruits glabrous or pubescent, not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ciliate; calyx pubescent, scarcely ciliate; corolla less than 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1/2 inch,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> white (blue, lilac - Pullaiah)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> var. *Plumosa* : calyx densely hispid-hairy subplumose
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> var. *nilgherrensis* (*neolgherryensis*) : you have lit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your species had capsule slightly curved (check KEW herb
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> K000885689), while after checking *plumosa* herb. at KEW
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> site it appears to me *plumosa* capsules are a bit shorter
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and straight.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think if these details can not be ascertain we need to go
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to var. *plumosa*, but leave it at *H. tentaculatus* only.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This does not apply to *neilgherryensis*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surajit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Anurag Sharma <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you sir.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I still do not know what to make of the difference between
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the var. under *Haplanthodes tentaculata*.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 6:16 PM, surajit koley <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry, here is the FBI.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 6:14 PM, surajit koley <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, Anurag Ji, I missed the glandular cladode of *H.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> verticillaris*. And also fruit size was unknown to me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Attached here the FBI entries. I stressed on calyx character 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which was not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> visible in attached pictures, couldn't make out length of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cladode in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> various threads.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for those differentiating characters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surajit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Anurag Sharma <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Based on Gamble and Flora of Hassan District (attached), 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Biodiversity
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in India
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://books.google.co.in/books?id=M0ucOe89GZMC&pg=PA592&lpg=PA592&dq=HAPLANTHUS+TENTACULATUS&source=bl&ots=cVvc3YFcOk&sig=307E8rMNGbFkyktAJ3S34098hRc&hl=en&sa=X&ei=BnktVefgJ5WmuQSci4DACA&ved=0CD4Q6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=HAPLANTHUS%20TENTACULATUS&f=false>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and JCB
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://florakarnataka.ces.iisc.ernet.in/hjcb2/img/pdf/Haplanthodes%20verticillatus/page_533.pdf.jpg>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   *CHARACTER*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Haplanthus verticillaris* Nees
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Haplanthodes verticillatus* (Roxb.) R.B.Majumdar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Haplanthus neilgherryensis *Wight
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Haplanthodes nilgherrensis* (Wight) R.B.Majumdar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (this column can include the varieties coming under 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Haplanthodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tentaculatus- Haplanthus tentaculatus *group)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *INFLORESCENCE*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TERMINAL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *CLADODE*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .75-1.25 INCH
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ENDING IN 2 SPINOUS TEETH
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VILLOUS AND GLANDULAR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .5 INCH
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ENDING IN 2 OR MORE TEETH
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VILLOUS (NOT GLANDULAR)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *CAPSULE*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .4 INCH
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GLABROUS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .2 INCH
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PUBESCENT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *SEEDS*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6-16
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In the above cases, whether we:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) consider the varieties under *Haplanthodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tentaculatus* (L.) Nees or,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) think of them as coming under a Haplanthus
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tentaculatus group;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -the clear difference between *Haplanthodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> verticillatus* (Roxb.) R.B.Majumdar and the other
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> species (singular/plural) is- *cladodes densely
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pubescent* *AND* *glandular hairy* in *Haplanthodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> verticillatus* (Roxb.) R.B.Majumdar while the other is *ONLY
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *densely pubescent.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If this is agreeable, then may be we finally have a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definite idea of what is and isn't *Haplanthodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> verticillatus* (Roxb.) R.B.Majumdar based on the cladode
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being glandular hairy?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please correct me if I have gone wrong anywhere.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:00 AM, surajit koley <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes for both of your questions, I think Anurag Ji.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> q1 = ref.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://florakarnataka.ces.iisc.ernet.in/hjcb2/img/pdf/Haplanthodes%20verticillatus/page_533.pdf.jpg
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> q2 = I used the term "*H. tentaculatus* group", for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type species as well as var. *nilgherrensis* and var.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *plumosa*.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Haplanthodes* is synonymous with *Haplanthus* and also
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with *Berekampia* in our cases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:30 AM, Anurag Sharma <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and also, as a continuation of 2) =*Haplanthus
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tentaculatus* group?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Anurag Sharma <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sir,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe I may have a resolving idea to put forth but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first I would like to know if:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) *Haplanthus verticillaris* Nees = *Haplanthodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> verticillatus* (Roxb.) R.B.Majumdar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) *Haplanthus neilgherryensis *Wight = *Haplanthodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nilgherrensis* (Wight) R.B.Majumdar?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:31 PM, surajit koley <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I asked if any member can access the paper
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.3417/2013046. What
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I come to know is that *Haplanthodes tentaculatus* (L.)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nees is further divided in to var. *nilgherryensis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/a/acanthaceae/haplanthodes/haplanthodes-nilgherrensis>*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> var. plumosa
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://plants.jstor.org/stable/history/10.5555/al.ap.specimen.k000885684>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> besides type species.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> First, I do not have literature, be it century old,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on South Indian flora. I have never seen one physical 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> species, never before
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even in images. The first time I saw/noticed it in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anurag Ji's thread
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/D5V4vxlW5nc/5q0B7fF9oQ0J>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Second, it appears to me that various uploads of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Haplanthodes*, in eFI, are very confusing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Third, internet doesn't feature any photograph of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> related species other than those of Dinesh Ji, Prashant 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ji and one or two
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of others.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fourth, I do not even know how to differentiate *H.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> verticillatus* from *H. tentaculatus*.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dinesh Ji threw some light -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/NbKZ2cRILsc/znbfFPnQ7iAJ
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    2.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/C6E9D20qujk/tAcJAwm8ZEEJ
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/d6pQ0ry1jP0/wfhnGOsjAWEJ
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FBI recorded, corolla in *H. verticillatus* (
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *verticillaris*) is pale lilac; against dark lilac
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://florakarnataka.ces.iisc.ernet.in/hjcb2/herbsheet.php?id=151&cat=1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "brilliant blue" in Dinesh Ji's KEY in link1 above.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prashant Ji has both white & blue colour *H.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nilgherryensis*.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, it is quite impossible for me to decipher the id
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of this species. More so, because except the flowering 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spikes no detail on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sepals, sizes of corolla and calyx etc are available.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If this belongs to *H. tantaculatus* group it is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unlikely to be var. *plumosa*, because of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following herbarium -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Herb. of *Ruellia tentaculata* -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://linnean-online.org/6882/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possibly type species -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000885683
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> var. *nilgherrensis* -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000885689
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000885688
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000885687
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> var. *plumosa* -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000885684
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000885685
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000885686
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think var. *plumosa* doesn't have dense spike.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surajit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:43 PM, surajit koley <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anybody have access to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.3417/2013046?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:55 PM, J.M. Garg <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Forwarding again for Id assistance please.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some earlier relevant feedback:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  efi page on Haplanthodes plumosa
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/a/acanthaceae/haplanthodes/haplanthodes-plumosa>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Haplanthodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/a/acanthaceae/haplanthodes>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  species in eFIoraofindia (with details/ keys from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> published papers/ regional floras/ FRLHT/ FOI/ 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> efloras/ books etc., where
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ever available)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Prashant Awale <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: 23 March 2015 at 14:03
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: [efloraofindia:218868] Acanthaceae
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fortnight ::Haplanthodes sp? :: Ganapatipule:: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PKA-MAR29/29: :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: indiantreepix <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Friends,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Came across this Haplanthodes sp. at Jaigad fort
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> near Ganapatipule. Could this be Haplanthodes 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> plumosa?. Kindly validate the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ID.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   *Botanical name:*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Haplanthodes sp.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Family:*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Acanthaceae
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Date/Time-*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 29-03-2010 /11:40 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Location- Place, Altitude, GPS- *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jaigad Fort  near Ganapatipule- Ratnagiri
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Habitat- Garden/ Urban/ Wild/ Type-*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wild
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Plant Habit- Tree/ Shrub/ Climber/ Herb-  *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Herb
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Height/Length- *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 30 to 50 cm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Leaves Type/ Shape/ Size-*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Opposite, 3 to 5 cm, Some leaves were acuminate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and some were with somewhat rounded apex ,  hairy,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> leaf base extending down to petiole,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Inflorescence Type/ Size- *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Photograph enclosed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Flowers Size/ Colour/ Calyx/ Bracts-*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flowers sessile, corolla approx. 8 to 12mm, purple
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Photograph enclosed)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Fruits Type/ Shape/ Size Seeds-*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not known
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Other Information like Fragrance, Pollinator, Uses
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.- *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prashant
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> emails from it, send an email to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Visit this group at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> J.M.Garg
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The whole world uses my Image Resource
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more than a thousand species & eight thousand images 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Birds, Butterflies,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Plants etc. (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can also use them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for free as per Creative Commons license attached with 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> each image.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For identification, learning, discussion &
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation of Indian Flora, please visit/ join our 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Efloraofindia
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google e-group
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/indiantreepix>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  (largest
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the world- more than 2400 members & 2,00,000 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> messages on 9.9.14) or Efloraofindia
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> website
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (with a species database of more than 10,000 species & 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2,00,000 images). Winner
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Wipro-NFS Sparrow Awards 2014 for efloraofindia
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/award-for-efloraofindia>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kolkata & Common Birds of India'.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> emails from it, send an email to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Visit this group at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anurag N. Sharma
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> St. Josephs College
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bangalore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anurag N. Sharma
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> St. Josephs College
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bangalore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anurag N. Sharma
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> St. Josephs College
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bangalore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anurag N. Sharma
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> St. Josephs College
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bangalore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Anurag N. Sharma
>>>>>>>>>>>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year
>>>>>>>>>>>> St. Josephs College
>>>>>>>>>>>> Bangalore
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Anurag N. Sharma
>>>>>>>>>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year
>>>>>>>>>> St. Josephs College
>>>>>>>>>> Bangalore
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Anurag N. Sharma
>>>>>>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year
>>>>>>> St. Josephs College
>>>>>>> Bangalore
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Anurag N. Sharma
>>>>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year
>>>>> St. Josephs College
>>>>> Bangalore
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Anurag N. Sharma
>>>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year
>>>> St. Josephs College
>>>> Bangalore
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Anurag N. Sharma
>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year
>> St. Josephs College
>> Bangalore
>>
>
>


-- 
Anurag N. Sharma
BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year
St. Josephs College
Bangalore

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to