btw, Calyx of *H. verticillaris* is 1 line (1 line = 2.1 mm). corolla 6 line long (note the calyx to corolla ratio); calyx glabrous or nearly so (ref. http://www.herbier-mpu.org/zoomify/zoomify.php?fichier=MPU018249).
Thank you Regards On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:13 AM, surajit koley < [email protected]> wrote: > Our concern is with only two species of FBI, Anurag Ji, *Haplanthus > verticillaris* and *H. tentaculatus*. The later includes var. > *nilgherrensis* and var. *plumosa*. > > Since I have no field experience on this particular genus I depend on > DInesh Ji's experience - of *H. neilgherryensis* - > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/NbKZ2cRILsc/znbfFPnQ7iAJ > > I have collected info from various threads, examined online herbarium, > read old lit. and cooked my own recipe. I do not claim my dish is healthy > and nutritious! > > Thank you > Regards > surajit > > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:09 AM, Anurag Sharma <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Thanks sir. >> >> One question- are the pseudowhorls forming further branches not seen ANY >> of the other threads on the group? >> >> On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 9:56 PM, surajit koley < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Dear Anurag Ji, >>> >>> If *Haplanthus verticillaris* Nees can have 3 teeth sometimes then >>> number of teeth won't be a KEY to id species. Attached here what Wight >>> recorded about cladode teeth in *H. nilgherrensis*. Please note what >>> Wight referred to "bract" may be he meant cladode. >>> >>> After going through all uploads of *Haplanthus*/*Haplanthodes* I think - >>> >>> - length cladode is vital (ref. FBI and "note" in >>> http://linnean-online.org/6882/) >>> - I am not sure if presence/absence of glandular hair can be a KEY >>> - In *H. neilgherryensis* flowers in pseudo-whorls taking a form of >>> terminal spike; cladodes and sepals with white hairs (ref. FBI) >>> - In var. *plumosa* pseudo-whorls are relatively wide spaced; sepals >>> are hairy subplumose >>> - In *H. tentacularis* cladodes are smaller than *H. verticillaris* and >>> not ciliate (ref. FBI and Linnean site) >>> >>> However, I think I have found *H. t.* var. *plumosa*! Here it is - >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/By2tCca-aOs/niDaDdPIZU8J. >>> Check the two photographs in highest resolution, you will see plumose >>> sepals clearly. Besides, each pseudo-whorl in that plant gives rise to >>> sub-branches which do again form flowering pseudowhorl of cladodes (Dinesh >>> Ji pointed out this character in a thread). Please also compare those two >>> pics with another upload(s) by Neil Sir - >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/CCj373r5vGw/GrD_qNzUKkEJ Note >>> the darker pattern in corolla lobes in both the thread >>> >>> Thank you >>> Regards >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Anurag Sharma <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Well sir, in one Flora that I saw, it said cladodes in H. verticillatus >>>> generally 2 toothed, rarely 3. I cannot find it right now. Will attach when >>>> I do. >>>> >>>> Thank you. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:25 PM, surajit koley < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Anurag Ji, >>>>> >>>>> I copy here the KEY, based on various lit, you have provided - >>>>> >>>>> *CHARACTER* >>>>> >>>>> *Haplanthus verticillaris* Nees >>>>> >>>>> *Haplanthodes verticillatus* (Roxb.) R.B.Majumdar >>>>> >>>>> *Haplanthus neilgherryensis *Wight >>>>> >>>>> *Haplanthodes nilgherrensis* (Wight) R.B.Majumdar >>>>> >>>>> (this column can include the varieties coming under*Haplanthodes >>>>> tentaculatus- Haplanthus tentaculatus*group) >>>>> >>>>> *INFLORESCENCE* >>>>> >>>>> ? >>>>> >>>>> TERMINAL >>>>> >>>>> *CLADODE* >>>>> >>>>> .75-1.25 INCH >>>>> >>>>> ENDING IN 2 SPINOUS TEETH >>>>> >>>>> VILLOUS AND GLANDULAR >>>>> >>>>> .5 INCH >>>>> >>>>> ENDING IN 2 OR MORE TEETH >>>>> >>>>> VILLOUS (NOT GLANDULAR) >>>>> >>>>> *CAPSULE* >>>>> >>>>> .4 INCH >>>>> >>>>> GLABROUS >>>>> >>>>> .2 INCH >>>>> >>>>> PUBESCENT >>>>> >>>>> *SEEDS* >>>>> >>>>> 6-16 >>>>> >>>>> ? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Please check the thread >>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/C6E9D20qujk/x1u7YD85F60J. >>>>> To me cladodes seem to be gladular, yet number of teeth is two in some & >>>>> three in others. What do you think? >>>>> >>>>> Regards >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:59 PM, surajit koley < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Anurag Ji, >>>>>> >>>>>> I do not know. Since we do not have other source we will have to >>>>>> depend on FBI. I copy a few words - >>>>>> >>>>>> Type species : cladodes in fruits glabrous or pubescent, not ciliate; >>>>>> calyx pubescent, scarcely ciliate; corolla less than 1/2 inch, white >>>>>> (blue, >>>>>> lilac - Pullaiah) >>>>>> var. *Plumosa* : calyx densely hispid-hairy subplumose >>>>>> var. *nilgherrensis* (*neolgherryensis*) : you have lit. >>>>>> >>>>>> Your species had capsule slightly curved (check KEW herb K000885689), >>>>>> while after checking *plumosa* herb. at KEW site it appears to me >>>>>> *plumosa* capsules are a bit shorter and straight. >>>>>> >>>>>> I think if these details can not be ascertain we need to go to var. >>>>>> *plumosa*, but leave it at *H. tentaculatus* only. This does not >>>>>> apply to *neilgherryensis* >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> surajit >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Anurag Sharma < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you sir. >>>>>>> I still do not know what to make of the difference between the var. >>>>>>> under *Haplanthodes tentaculata*. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 6:16 PM, surajit koley < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sorry, here is the FBI. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thank you >>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 6:14 PM, surajit koley < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Well, Anurag Ji, I missed the glandular cladode of *H. >>>>>>>>> verticillaris*. And also fruit size was unknown to me. Attached >>>>>>>>> here the FBI entries. I stressed on calyx character which was not >>>>>>>>> visible >>>>>>>>> in attached pictures, couldn't make out length of cladode in various >>>>>>>>> threads. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for those differentiating characters. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>> surajit >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Anurag Sharma < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Based on Gamble and Flora of Hassan District (attached), Biodiversity >>>>>>>>>> in India >>>>>>>>>> <https://books.google.co.in/books?id=M0ucOe89GZMC&pg=PA592&lpg=PA592&dq=HAPLANTHUS+TENTACULATUS&source=bl&ots=cVvc3YFcOk&sig=307E8rMNGbFkyktAJ3S34098hRc&hl=en&sa=X&ei=BnktVefgJ5WmuQSci4DACA&ved=0CD4Q6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=HAPLANTHUS%20TENTACULATUS&f=false> >>>>>>>>>> and JCB >>>>>>>>>> <http://florakarnataka.ces.iisc.ernet.in/hjcb2/img/pdf/Haplanthodes%20verticillatus/page_533.pdf.jpg> >>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *CHARACTER* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *Haplanthus verticillaris* Nees >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *Haplanthodes verticillatus* (Roxb.) R.B.Majumdar >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *Haplanthus neilgherryensis *Wight >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *Haplanthodes nilgherrensis* (Wight) R.B.Majumdar >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> (this column can include the varieties coming under *Haplanthodes >>>>>>>>>> tentaculatus- Haplanthus tentaculatus *group) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *INFLORESCENCE* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> TERMINAL >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *CLADODE* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> .75-1.25 INCH >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ENDING IN 2 SPINOUS TEETH >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> VILLOUS AND GLANDULAR >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> .5 INCH >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ENDING IN 2 OR MORE TEETH >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> VILLOUS (NOT GLANDULAR) >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *CAPSULE* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> .4 INCH >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> GLABROUS >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> .2 INCH >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> PUBESCENT >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> *SEEDS* >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 6-16 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> ? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> In the above cases, whether we: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> 1) consider the varieties under *Haplanthodes tentaculatus* (L.) >>>>>>>>>> Nees or, >>>>>>>>>> 2) think of them as coming under a Haplanthus tentaculatus group; >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -the clear difference between *Haplanthodes verticillatus* >>>>>>>>>> (Roxb.) R.B.Majumdar and the other species (singular/plural) is- >>>>>>>>>> *cladodes >>>>>>>>>> densely pubescent* *AND* *glandular hairy* in *Haplanthodes >>>>>>>>>> verticillatus* (Roxb.) R.B.Majumdar while the other is *ONLY *densely >>>>>>>>>> pubescent. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> If this is agreeable, then may be we finally have a definite idea >>>>>>>>>> of what is and isn't *Haplanthodes verticillatus* (Roxb.) >>>>>>>>>> R.B.Majumdar based on the cladode being glandular hairy? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Please correct me if I have gone wrong anywhere. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:00 AM, surajit koley < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Yes for both of your questions, I think Anurag Ji. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> q1 = ref. >>>>>>>>>>> http://florakarnataka.ces.iisc.ernet.in/hjcb2/img/pdf/Haplanthodes%20verticillatus/page_533.pdf.jpg >>>>>>>>>>> q2 = I used the term "*H. tentaculatus* group", for the type >>>>>>>>>>> species as well as var. *nilgherrensis* and var. *plumosa*. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> *Haplanthodes* is synonymous with *Haplanthus* and also with >>>>>>>>>>> *Berekampia* in our cases. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thank you >>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:30 AM, Anurag Sharma < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> and also, as a continuation of 2) =*Haplanthus tentaculatus* >>>>>>>>>>>> group? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Anurag Sharma < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Sir, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe I may have a resolving idea to put forth but first I >>>>>>>>>>>>> would like to know if: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) *Haplanthus verticillaris* Nees = *Haplanthodes >>>>>>>>>>>>> verticillatus* (Roxb.) R.B.Majumdar >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) *Haplanthus neilgherryensis *Wight = *Haplanthodes >>>>>>>>>>>>> nilgherrensis* (Wight) R.B.Majumdar? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:31 PM, surajit koley < >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I asked if any member can access the paper >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.3417/2013046. What I come >>>>>>>>>>>>>> to know is that *Haplanthodes tentaculatus* (L.) Nees is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> further divided in to var. *nilgherryensis >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/a/acanthaceae/haplanthodes/haplanthodes-nilgherrensis>* >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> var. plumosa >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://plants.jstor.org/stable/history/10.5555/al.ap.specimen.k000885684>, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> besides type species. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> First, I do not have literature, be it century old, on South >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Indian flora. I have never seen one physical species, never >>>>>>>>>>>>>> before even in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> images. The first time I saw/noticed it in Anurag Ji's thread >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/D5V4vxlW5nc/5q0B7fF9oQ0J> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Second, it appears to me that various uploads of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Haplanthodes*, in eFI, are very confusing. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Third, internet doesn't feature any photograph of related >>>>>>>>>>>>>> species other than those of Dinesh Ji, Prashant Ji and one or >>>>>>>>>>>>>> two of others. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fourth, I do not even know how to differentiate *H. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> verticillatus* from *H. tentaculatus*. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dinesh Ji threw some light - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/NbKZ2cRILsc/znbfFPnQ7iAJ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/C6E9D20qujk/tAcJAwm8ZEEJ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/d6pQ0ry1jP0/wfhnGOsjAWEJ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> FBI recorded, corolla in *H. verticillatus* (*verticillaris*) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is pale lilac; against dark lilac in >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://florakarnataka.ces.iisc.ernet.in/hjcb2/herbsheet.php?id=151&cat=1 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>>>> "brilliant blue" in Dinesh Ji's KEY in link1 above. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prashant Ji has both white & blue colour *H. nilgherryensis*. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, it is quite impossible for me to decipher the id of this >>>>>>>>>>>>>> species. More so, because except the flowering spikes no detail >>>>>>>>>>>>>> on sepals, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> sizes of corolla and calyx etc are available. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> If this belongs to *H. tantaculatus* group it is unlikely to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> be var. *plumosa*, because of the following herbarium - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Herb. of *Ruellia tentaculata* - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://linnean-online.org/6882/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> possibly type species - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000885683 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> var. *nilgherrensis* - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000885689 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000885688 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000885687 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> var. *plumosa* - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000885684 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000885685 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000885686 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think var. *plumosa* doesn't have dense spike. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>> surajit >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:43 PM, surajit koley < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anybody have access to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.3417/2013046? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:55 PM, J.M. Garg < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Forwarding again for Id assistance please. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some earlier relevant feedback: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> efi page on Haplanthodes plumosa >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/a/acanthaceae/haplanthodes/haplanthodes-plumosa> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Haplanthodes >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/a/acanthaceae/haplanthodes> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> species in eFIoraofindia (with details/ keys from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> published papers/ regional floras/ FRLHT/ FOI/ efloras/ books >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc., where >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ever available) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Prashant Awale <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: 23 March 2015 at 14:03 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: [efloraofindia:218868] Acanthaceae Fortnight >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ::Haplanthodes sp? :: Ganapatipule:: PKA-MAR29/29: : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: indiantreepix <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Friends, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Came across this Haplanthodes sp. at Jaigad fort near >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ganapatipule. Could this be Haplanthodes plumosa?. Kindly >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> validate the ID. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Botanical name:* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Haplanthodes sp. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Family:* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Acanthaceae >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Date/Time-* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 29-03-2010 /11:40 AM >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Location- Place, Altitude, GPS- * >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jaigad Fort near Ganapatipule- Ratnagiri >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Habitat- Garden/ Urban/ Wild/ Type-* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wild >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Plant Habit- Tree/ Shrub/ Climber/ Herb- * >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Herb >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Height/Length- * >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 30 to 50 cm >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Leaves Type/ Shape/ Size-* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Opposite, 3 to 5 cm, Some leaves were acuminate and some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> were with somewhat rounded apex , hairy, leaf base >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> extending down to petiole, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Inflorescence Type/ Size- * >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Photograph enclosed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Flowers Size/ Colour/ Calyx/ Bracts-* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flowers sessile, corolla approx. 8 to 12mm, purple >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Photograph enclosed) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Fruits Type/ Shape/ Size Seeds-* >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not known >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Other Information like Fragrance, Pollinator, Uses etc.- * >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prashant >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from it, send an email to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Visit this group at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> J.M.Garg >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna' >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The whole world uses my Image Resource >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more than a thousand species & eight thousand images of Birds, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Butterflies, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Plants etc. (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> also use them >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for free as per Creative Commons license attached with each >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> image. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Indian Flora, please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> e-group >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/indiantreepix> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (largest >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the world- more than 2400 members & 2,00,000 messages on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9.9.14) or Efloraofindia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> website <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (with a species database of more than 10,000 species & >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2,00,000 images). Winner >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Wipro-NFS Sparrow Awards 2014 for efloraofindia >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/award-for-efloraofindia> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Common Birds of India'. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Visit this group at >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Anurag N. Sharma >>>>>>>>>>>>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year >>>>>>>>>>>>> St. Josephs College >>>>>>>>>>>>> Bangalore >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> Anurag N. Sharma >>>>>>>>>>>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year >>>>>>>>>>>> St. Josephs College >>>>>>>>>>>> Bangalore >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Anurag N. Sharma >>>>>>>>>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year >>>>>>>>>> St. Josephs College >>>>>>>>>> Bangalore >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> Anurag N. Sharma >>>>>>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year >>>>>>> St. Josephs College >>>>>>> Bangalore >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Anurag N. Sharma >>>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year >>>> St. Josephs College >>>> Bangalore >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Anurag N. Sharma >> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year >> St. Josephs College >> Bangalore >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
