Thanks sir. One question- are the pseudowhorls forming further branches not seen ANY of the other threads on the group?
On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 9:56 PM, surajit koley < [email protected]> wrote: > Dear Anurag Ji, > > If *Haplanthus verticillaris* Nees can have 3 teeth sometimes then number > of teeth won't be a KEY to id species. Attached here what Wight recorded > about cladode teeth in *H. nilgherrensis*. Please note what Wight > referred to "bract" may be he meant cladode. > > After going through all uploads of *Haplanthus*/*Haplanthodes* I think - > > - length cladode is vital (ref. FBI and "note" in > http://linnean-online.org/6882/) > - I am not sure if presence/absence of glandular hair can be a KEY > - In *H. neilgherryensis* flowers in pseudo-whorls taking a form of > terminal spike; cladodes and sepals with white hairs (ref. FBI) > - In var. *plumosa* pseudo-whorls are relatively wide spaced; sepals > are hairy subplumose > - In *H. tentacularis* cladodes are smaller than *H. verticillaris* and > not ciliate (ref. FBI and Linnean site) > > However, I think I have found *H. t.* var. *plumosa*! Here it is - > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/By2tCca-aOs/niDaDdPIZU8J. > Check the two photographs in highest resolution, you will see plumose > sepals clearly. Besides, each pseudo-whorl in that plant gives rise to > sub-branches which do again form flowering pseudowhorl of cladodes (Dinesh > Ji pointed out this character in a thread). Please also compare those two > pics with another upload(s) by Neil Sir - > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/CCj373r5vGw/GrD_qNzUKkEJ Note > the darker pattern in corolla lobes in both the thread > > Thank you > Regards > > > On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Anurag Sharma <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Well sir, in one Flora that I saw, it said cladodes in H. verticillatus >> generally 2 toothed, rarely 3. I cannot find it right now. Will attach when >> I do. >> >> Thank you. >> >> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:25 PM, surajit koley < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Anurag Ji, >>> >>> I copy here the KEY, based on various lit, you have provided - >>> >>> *CHARACTER* >>> >>> *Haplanthus verticillaris* Nees >>> >>> *Haplanthodes verticillatus* (Roxb.) R.B.Majumdar >>> >>> *Haplanthus neilgherryensis *Wight >>> >>> *Haplanthodes nilgherrensis* (Wight) R.B.Majumdar >>> >>> (this column can include the varieties coming under*Haplanthodes >>> tentaculatus- Haplanthus tentaculatus*group) >>> >>> *INFLORESCENCE* >>> >>> ? >>> >>> TERMINAL >>> >>> *CLADODE* >>> >>> .75-1.25 INCH >>> >>> ENDING IN 2 SPINOUS TEETH >>> >>> VILLOUS AND GLANDULAR >>> >>> .5 INCH >>> >>> ENDING IN 2 OR MORE TEETH >>> >>> VILLOUS (NOT GLANDULAR) >>> >>> *CAPSULE* >>> >>> .4 INCH >>> >>> GLABROUS >>> >>> .2 INCH >>> >>> PUBESCENT >>> >>> *SEEDS* >>> >>> 6-16 >>> >>> ? >>> >>> >>> Please check the thread >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/C6E9D20qujk/x1u7YD85F60J. >>> To me cladodes seem to be gladular, yet number of teeth is two in some & >>> three in others. What do you think? >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:59 PM, surajit koley < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Anurag Ji, >>>> >>>> I do not know. Since we do not have other source we will have to depend >>>> on FBI. I copy a few words - >>>> >>>> Type species : cladodes in fruits glabrous or pubescent, not ciliate; >>>> calyx pubescent, scarcely ciliate; corolla less than 1/2 inch, white (blue, >>>> lilac - Pullaiah) >>>> var. *Plumosa* : calyx densely hispid-hairy subplumose >>>> var. *nilgherrensis* (*neolgherryensis*) : you have lit. >>>> >>>> Your species had capsule slightly curved (check KEW herb K000885689), >>>> while after checking *plumosa* herb. at KEW site it appears to me >>>> *plumosa* capsules are a bit shorter and straight. >>>> >>>> I think if these details can not be ascertain we need to go to var. >>>> *plumosa*, but leave it at *H. tentaculatus* only. This does not apply >>>> to *neilgherryensis* >>>> >>>> Thank you >>>> Regards >>>> surajit >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Anurag Sharma <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Thank you sir. >>>>> I still do not know what to make of the difference between the var. >>>>> under *Haplanthodes tentaculata*. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 6:16 PM, surajit koley < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Sorry, here is the FBI. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you >>>>>> Regards >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 6:14 PM, surajit koley < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Well, Anurag Ji, I missed the glandular cladode of *H. >>>>>>> verticillaris*. And also fruit size was unknown to me. Attached >>>>>>> here the FBI entries. I stressed on calyx character which was not >>>>>>> visible >>>>>>> in attached pictures, couldn't make out length of cladode in various >>>>>>> threads. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you very much for those differentiating characters. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>> surajit >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Anurag Sharma < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Based on Gamble and Flora of Hassan District (attached), Biodiversity >>>>>>>> in India >>>>>>>> <https://books.google.co.in/books?id=M0ucOe89GZMC&pg=PA592&lpg=PA592&dq=HAPLANTHUS+TENTACULATUS&source=bl&ots=cVvc3YFcOk&sig=307E8rMNGbFkyktAJ3S34098hRc&hl=en&sa=X&ei=BnktVefgJ5WmuQSci4DACA&ved=0CD4Q6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=HAPLANTHUS%20TENTACULATUS&f=false> >>>>>>>> and JCB >>>>>>>> <http://florakarnataka.ces.iisc.ernet.in/hjcb2/img/pdf/Haplanthodes%20verticillatus/page_533.pdf.jpg> >>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *CHARACTER* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Haplanthus verticillaris* Nees >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Haplanthodes verticillatus* (Roxb.) R.B.Majumdar >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Haplanthus neilgherryensis *Wight >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *Haplanthodes nilgherrensis* (Wight) R.B.Majumdar >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> (this column can include the varieties coming under *Haplanthodes >>>>>>>> tentaculatus- Haplanthus tentaculatus *group) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *INFLORESCENCE* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> TERMINAL >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *CLADODE* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> .75-1.25 INCH >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ENDING IN 2 SPINOUS TEETH >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> VILLOUS AND GLANDULAR >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> .5 INCH >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ENDING IN 2 OR MORE TEETH >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> VILLOUS (NOT GLANDULAR) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *CAPSULE* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> .4 INCH >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> GLABROUS >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> .2 INCH >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> PUBESCENT >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> *SEEDS* >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 6-16 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> ? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> In the above cases, whether we: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 1) consider the varieties under *Haplanthodes tentaculatus* (L.) >>>>>>>> Nees or, >>>>>>>> 2) think of them as coming under a Haplanthus tentaculatus group; >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -the clear difference between *Haplanthodes verticillatus* (Roxb.) >>>>>>>> R.B.Majumdar and the other species (singular/plural) is- *cladodes >>>>>>>> densely pubescent* *AND* *glandular hairy* in *Haplanthodes >>>>>>>> verticillatus* (Roxb.) R.B.Majumdar while the other is *ONLY *densely >>>>>>>> pubescent. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> If this is agreeable, then may be we finally have a definite idea >>>>>>>> of what is and isn't *Haplanthodes verticillatus* (Roxb.) >>>>>>>> R.B.Majumdar based on the cladode being glandular hairy? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please correct me if I have gone wrong anywhere. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:00 AM, surajit koley < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yes for both of your questions, I think Anurag Ji. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> q1 = ref. >>>>>>>>> http://florakarnataka.ces.iisc.ernet.in/hjcb2/img/pdf/Haplanthodes%20verticillatus/page_533.pdf.jpg >>>>>>>>> q2 = I used the term "*H. tentaculatus* group", for the type >>>>>>>>> species as well as var. *nilgherrensis* and var. *plumosa*. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> *Haplanthodes* is synonymous with *Haplanthus* and also with >>>>>>>>> *Berekampia* in our cases. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thank you >>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:30 AM, Anurag Sharma < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> and also, as a continuation of 2) =*Haplanthus tentaculatus* >>>>>>>>>> group? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Anurag Sharma < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Sir, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I believe I may have a resolving idea to put forth but first I >>>>>>>>>>> would like to know if: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 1) *Haplanthus verticillaris* Nees = *Haplanthodes >>>>>>>>>>> verticillatus* (Roxb.) R.B.Majumdar >>>>>>>>>>> 2) *Haplanthus neilgherryensis *Wight = *Haplanthodes >>>>>>>>>>> nilgherrensis* (Wight) R.B.Majumdar? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:31 PM, surajit koley < >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I asked if any member can access the paper >>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.3417/2013046. What I come to >>>>>>>>>>>> know is that *Haplanthodes tentaculatus* (L.) Nees is further >>>>>>>>>>>> divided in to var. *nilgherryensis >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/a/acanthaceae/haplanthodes/haplanthodes-nilgherrensis>* >>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>> var. plumosa >>>>>>>>>>>> <http://plants.jstor.org/stable/history/10.5555/al.ap.specimen.k000885684>, >>>>>>>>>>>> besides type species. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> First, I do not have literature, be it century old, on South >>>>>>>>>>>> Indian flora. I have never seen one physical species, never before >>>>>>>>>>>> even in >>>>>>>>>>>> images. The first time I saw/noticed it in Anurag Ji's thread >>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/D5V4vxlW5nc/5q0B7fF9oQ0J> >>>>>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>>>> Second, it appears to me that various uploads of *Haplanthodes*, >>>>>>>>>>>> in eFI, are very confusing. >>>>>>>>>>>> Third, internet doesn't feature any photograph of related >>>>>>>>>>>> species other than those of Dinesh Ji, Prashant Ji and one or two >>>>>>>>>>>> of others. >>>>>>>>>>>> Fourth, I do not even know how to differentiate *H. >>>>>>>>>>>> verticillatus* from *H. tentaculatus*. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Dinesh Ji threw some light - >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 1. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/NbKZ2cRILsc/znbfFPnQ7iAJ >>>>>>>>>>>> 2. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/C6E9D20qujk/tAcJAwm8ZEEJ >>>>>>>>>>>> 3. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/d6pQ0ry1jP0/wfhnGOsjAWEJ >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> FBI recorded, corolla in *H. verticillatus* (*verticillaris*) >>>>>>>>>>>> is pale lilac; against dark lilac in >>>>>>>>>>>> http://florakarnataka.ces.iisc.ernet.in/hjcb2/herbsheet.php?id=151&cat=1 >>>>>>>>>>>> and >>>>>>>>>>>> "brilliant blue" in Dinesh Ji's KEY in link1 above. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Prashant Ji has both white & blue colour *H. nilgherryensis*. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> So, it is quite impossible for me to decipher the id of this >>>>>>>>>>>> species. More so, because except the flowering spikes no detail on >>>>>>>>>>>> sepals, >>>>>>>>>>>> sizes of corolla and calyx etc are available. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> If this belongs to *H. tantaculatus* group it is unlikely to >>>>>>>>>>>> be var. *plumosa*, because of the following herbarium - >>>>>>>>>>>> Herb. of *Ruellia tentaculata* - >>>>>>>>>>>> http://linnean-online.org/6882/ >>>>>>>>>>>> possibly type species - >>>>>>>>>>>> http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000885683 >>>>>>>>>>>> var. *nilgherrensis* - >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>> http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000885689 >>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>> http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000885688 >>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>> http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000885687 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> var. *plumosa* - >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>> http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000885684 >>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>> http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000885685 >>>>>>>>>>>> - >>>>>>>>>>>> http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000885686 >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I think var. *plumosa* doesn't have dense spike. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you >>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>> surajit >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:43 PM, surajit koley < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anybody have access to >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.3417/2013046? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:55 PM, J.M. Garg <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Forwarding again for Id assistance please. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some earlier relevant feedback: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> efi page on Haplanthodes plumosa >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/a/acanthaceae/haplanthodes/haplanthodes-plumosa> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Haplanthodes >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/a/acanthaceae/haplanthodes> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> species in eFIoraofindia (with details/ keys from published >>>>>>>>>>>>>> papers/ regional floras/ FRLHT/ FOI/ efloras/ books etc., where >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ever >>>>>>>>>>>>>> available) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Prashant Awale <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: 23 March 2015 at 14:03 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: [efloraofindia:218868] Acanthaceae Fortnight >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ::Haplanthodes sp? :: Ganapatipule:: PKA-MAR29/29: : >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: indiantreepix <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Friends, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Came across this Haplanthodes sp. at Jaigad fort near >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ganapatipule. Could this be Haplanthodes plumosa?. Kindly >>>>>>>>>>>>>> validate the ID. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Botanical name:* >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Haplanthodes sp. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Family:* >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Acanthaceae >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Date/Time-* >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 29-03-2010 /11:40 AM >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Location- Place, Altitude, GPS- * >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jaigad Fort near Ganapatipule- Ratnagiri >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Habitat- Garden/ Urban/ Wild/ Type-* >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wild >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Plant Habit- Tree/ Shrub/ Climber/ Herb- * >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Herb >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Height/Length- * >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 30 to 50 cm >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Leaves Type/ Shape/ Size-* >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Opposite, 3 to 5 cm, Some leaves were acuminate and some >>>>>>>>>>>>>> were with somewhat rounded apex , hairy, leaf base >>>>>>>>>>>>>> extending down to petiole, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Inflorescence Type/ Size- * >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Photograph enclosed >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Flowers Size/ Colour/ Calyx/ Bracts-* >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flowers sessile, corolla approx. 8 to 12mm, purple >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Photograph enclosed) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Fruits Type/ Shape/ Size Seeds-* >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not known >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Other Information like Fragrance, Pollinator, Uses etc.- * >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prashant >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Visit this group at >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> With regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> J.M.Garg >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna' >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The whole world uses my Image Resource >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> more than a thousand species & eight thousand images of Birds, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Butterflies, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Plants etc. (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You can also >>>>>>>>>>>>>> use them >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for free as per Creative Commons license attached with each >>>>>>>>>>>>>> image. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For identification, learning, discussion & documentation of >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Indian Flora, please visit/ join our Efloraofindia Google >>>>>>>>>>>>>> e-group >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/indiantreepix> (largest >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the world- more than 2400 members & 2,00,000 messages on >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 9.9.14) or Efloraofindia >>>>>>>>>>>>>> website <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/> (with >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a species database of more than 10,000 species & 2,00,000 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> images). Winner >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Wipro-NFS Sparrow Awards 2014 for efloraofindia >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/award-for-efloraofindia> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata & Common >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Birds of India'. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. >>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from >>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>> . >>>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]. >>>>>>>>>>>> Visit this group at >>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. >>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> Anurag N. Sharma >>>>>>>>>>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year >>>>>>>>>>> St. Josephs College >>>>>>>>>>> Bangalore >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> Anurag N. Sharma >>>>>>>>>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year >>>>>>>>>> St. Josephs College >>>>>>>>>> Bangalore >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Anurag N. Sharma >>>>>>>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year >>>>>>>> St. Josephs College >>>>>>>> Bangalore >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Anurag N. Sharma >>>>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year >>>>> St. Josephs College >>>>> Bangalore >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Anurag N. Sharma >> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year >> St. Josephs College >> Bangalore >> > > -- Anurag N. Sharma BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year St. Josephs College Bangalore -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send an email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
