No sir, I am afraid without a clear view of the capsules, I wouldn't know
where to start.
But in this thread
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/indiantreepix/D5V4vxlW5nc/5q0B7fF9oQ0J>,
would you say that the capsule is pubescent or glabrous?

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 10:03 PM, surajit koley <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks Anurag Ji for the KEY to four species. But, does it help us to
> identify the species we/I have discussed so far in the following three
> threads? -
>
>    1.
>    https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/q8x3X5TrbrY/9LAisyYhIHwJ 
> (this
>    very thread)
>    2.
>    https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/D5V4vxlW5nc/5q0B7fF9oQ0J
>    3.
>    https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/By2tCca-aOs/niDaDdPIZU8J
>
> Would you please identify the above threads again?
>
> Regards
>
> surajit
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 7:54 PM, Anurag Sharma <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> Good evening sir. While going through the various flora in my college
>> taxonomy lab, I found this in the Flora of Nasik District (P.
>> Lakshminarasimhan and B.D Sharma). All four species have been keyed out:
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Anurag Sharma <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you very much sir- for the discussion and the summary!
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 10:37 PM, surajit koley <
>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dear Anurag Ji, following is the synopsis (based on very limited
>>>> resource we have discussed and pasted links) -
>>>>
>>>> *cladode length :-*
>>>> *verticillaris* (*verticillatus* ) = 19 mm to 30 mm
>>>> *tentaculatus* (incl. var.) = 06 mm to 20 mm
>>>>
>>>> *glandular hairs on cladodes :*
>>>> *verticillaris* (*verticillatus* ) = present
>>>> *tentaculatus* (incl. var.) = absent (in all var.?)
>>>>
>>>> *calyx :*
>>>> *verticillaris* (*verticillatus* ) = 2 mm long, glabrous or pubescent
>>>> *tentaculatus* =
>>>>
>>>>    - (around 4 to 5 mm long, pubescent or scarcely ciliate in var.
>>>>    *tentaculatus*
>>>>    - long (? should be more or less equal to above) and pilose in
>>>>    *neilgherryensis* (note : spike is congested than var.
>>>>    *tentaculatus*)
>>>>    - should be equal length to above and plumose in var. *plumosa*
>>>>
>>>> (please note KEW has herb. featuring intermediate form of var.
>>>> *tentaculatus* and var. *neilgherryensis*
>>>>
>>>> *colour of corolla :-*
>>>> uncertain to me in all species and var.
>>>>
>>>> Capsule size also uncertain (ref. JCB & Pullaiah); number of seeds not
>>>> known to me; seed of *tentaculatus* is smaller than *verticillaris* (ref.
>>>> FBI)
>>>>
>>>> Thank you
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 11:09 PM, Anurag Sharma <[email protected]
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I have a request sir.
>>>>> Could you please summarize our entire discussion so as to be referred
>>>>> to in the future when another post of Haplanthodes sp. comes up? This 
>>>>> would
>>>>> be quite helpful for me as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:29 AM, surajit koley <
>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> btw, Calyx of *H. verticillaris* is 1 line (1 line = 2.1 mm).
>>>>>> corolla 6 line long (note the calyx to corolla ratio); calyx glabrous or
>>>>>> nearly so (ref.
>>>>>> http://www.herbier-mpu.org/zoomify/zoomify.php?fichier=MPU018249).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 8:13 AM, surajit koley <
>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Our concern is with only two species of FBI, Anurag Ji, *Haplanthus
>>>>>>> verticillaris* and *H. tentaculatus*. The later includes var.
>>>>>>> *nilgherrensis* and var. *plumosa*.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Since I have no field experience on this particular genus I depend
>>>>>>> on DInesh Ji's experience - of *H. neilgherryensis* -
>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/NbKZ2cRILsc/znbfFPnQ7iAJ
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have collected info from various threads, examined online
>>>>>>> herbarium, read old lit. and cooked my own recipe. I do not claim my 
>>>>>>> dish
>>>>>>> is healthy and nutritious!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> surajit
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 1:09 AM, Anurag Sharma <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks sir.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> One question- are the pseudowhorls forming further branches not
>>>>>>>> seen ANY of the other threads on the group?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 9:56 PM, surajit koley <
>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dear Anurag Ji,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If *Haplanthus verticillaris* Nees can have 3 teeth sometimes
>>>>>>>>> then number of teeth won't be a KEY to id species. Attached here what 
>>>>>>>>> Wight
>>>>>>>>> recorded about cladode teeth in *H. nilgherrensis*. Please note
>>>>>>>>> what Wight referred to "bract" may be he meant cladode.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> After going through all uploads of *Haplanthus*/*Haplanthodes* I
>>>>>>>>> think -
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>    - length cladode is vital (ref. FBI and "note" in
>>>>>>>>>    http://linnean-online.org/6882/)
>>>>>>>>>    - I am not sure if presence/absence of glandular hair can be a
>>>>>>>>>    KEY
>>>>>>>>>    - In *H. neilgherryensis* flowers in pseudo-whorls taking a
>>>>>>>>>    form of terminal spike; cladodes and sepals with white hairs (ref. 
>>>>>>>>> FBI)
>>>>>>>>>    - In var. *plumosa* pseudo-whorls are relatively wide spaced;
>>>>>>>>>    sepals are hairy subplumose
>>>>>>>>>    - In *H. tentacularis* cladodes are smaller than *H.
>>>>>>>>>    verticillaris* and not ciliate (ref. FBI and Linnean site)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> However, I think I have found *H. t.* var. *plumosa*! Here it is
>>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/By2tCca-aOs/niDaDdPIZU8J.
>>>>>>>>> Check the two photographs in highest resolution, you will see plumose
>>>>>>>>> sepals clearly. Besides, each pseudo-whorl in that plant gives rise to
>>>>>>>>> sub-branches which do again form flowering pseudowhorl of cladodes 
>>>>>>>>> (Dinesh
>>>>>>>>> Ji pointed out this character in a thread). Please also compare those 
>>>>>>>>> two
>>>>>>>>> pics with another upload(s) by Neil Sir -
>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/CCj373r5vGw/GrD_qNzUKkEJ
>>>>>>>>>  Note
>>>>>>>>> the darker pattern in corolla lobes in both the thread
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 18, 2015 at 8:59 PM, Anurag Sharma <
>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Well sir, in one Flora that I saw, it said cladodes in H.
>>>>>>>>>> verticillatus generally 2 toothed, rarely 3. I cannot find it right 
>>>>>>>>>> now.
>>>>>>>>>> Will attach when I do.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thank you.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 11:25 PM, surajit koley <
>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Anurag Ji,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I copy here the KEY, based on various lit, you have provided -
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *CHARACTER*
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *Haplanthus verticillaris* Nees
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *Haplanthodes verticillatus* (Roxb.) R.B.Majumdar
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *Haplanthus neilgherryensis *Wight
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *Haplanthodes nilgherrensis* (Wight) R.B.Majumdar
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> (this column can include the varieties coming under*Haplanthodes
>>>>>>>>>>> tentaculatus- Haplanthus tentaculatus*group)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *INFLORESCENCE*
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> TERMINAL
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *CLADODE*
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> .75-1.25 INCH
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ENDING IN 2 SPINOUS TEETH
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> VILLOUS AND GLANDULAR
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> .5 INCH
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ENDING IN 2 OR MORE TEETH
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> VILLOUS (NOT GLANDULAR)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *CAPSULE*
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> .4 INCH
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> GLABROUS
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> .2 INCH
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> PUBESCENT
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *SEEDS*
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 6-16
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Please check the thread
>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/C6E9D20qujk/x1u7YD85F60J.
>>>>>>>>>>> To me cladodes seem to be gladular, yet number of teeth is two in 
>>>>>>>>>>> some &
>>>>>>>>>>> three in others. What do you think?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:59 PM, surajit koley <
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Anurag Ji,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I do not know. Since we do not have other source we will have
>>>>>>>>>>>> to depend on FBI. I copy a few words -
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Type species : cladodes in fruits glabrous or pubescent, not
>>>>>>>>>>>> ciliate; calyx pubescent, scarcely ciliate; corolla less than 1/2 
>>>>>>>>>>>> inch,
>>>>>>>>>>>> white (blue, lilac - Pullaiah)
>>>>>>>>>>>> var. *Plumosa* : calyx densely hispid-hairy subplumose
>>>>>>>>>>>> var. *nilgherrensis* (*neolgherryensis*) : you have lit.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Your species had capsule slightly curved (check KEW herb
>>>>>>>>>>>> K000885689), while after checking *plumosa* herb. at KEW site
>>>>>>>>>>>> it appears to me *plumosa* capsules are a bit shorter and
>>>>>>>>>>>> straight.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I think if these details can not be ascertain we need to go to
>>>>>>>>>>>> var. *plumosa*, but leave it at *H. tentaculatus* only. This
>>>>>>>>>>>> does not apply to *neilgherryensis*
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>> surajit
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:24 PM, Anurag Sharma <
>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you sir.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I still do not know what to make of the difference between the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> var. under *Haplanthodes tentaculata*.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 6:16 PM, surajit koley <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry, here is the FBI.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 6:14 PM, surajit koley <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, Anurag Ji, I missed the glandular cladode of *H.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> verticillaris*. And also fruit size was unknown to me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Attached here the FBI entries. I stressed on calyx character 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> which was not
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> visible in attached pictures, couldn't make out length of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cladode in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> various threads.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you very much for those differentiating characters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surajit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:00 PM, Anurag Sharma <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Based on Gamble and Flora of Hassan District (attached), 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Biodiversity
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in India
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://books.google.co.in/books?id=M0ucOe89GZMC&pg=PA592&lpg=PA592&dq=HAPLANTHUS+TENTACULATUS&source=bl&ots=cVvc3YFcOk&sig=307E8rMNGbFkyktAJ3S34098hRc&hl=en&sa=X&ei=BnktVefgJ5WmuQSci4DACA&ved=0CD4Q6AEwBw#v=onepage&q=HAPLANTHUS%20TENTACULATUS&f=false>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and JCB
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://florakarnataka.ces.iisc.ernet.in/hjcb2/img/pdf/Haplanthodes%20verticillatus/page_533.pdf.jpg>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   *CHARACTER*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Haplanthus verticillaris* Nees
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Haplanthodes verticillatus* (Roxb.) R.B.Majumdar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Haplanthus neilgherryensis *Wight
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Haplanthodes nilgherrensis* (Wight) R.B.Majumdar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (this column can include the varieties coming under 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Haplanthodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tentaculatus- Haplanthus tentaculatus *group)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *INFLORESCENCE*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> TERMINAL
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *CLADODE*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .75-1.25 INCH
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ENDING IN 2 SPINOUS TEETH
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VILLOUS AND GLANDULAR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .5 INCH
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ENDING IN 2 OR MORE TEETH
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> VILLOUS (NOT GLANDULAR)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *CAPSULE*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .4 INCH
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GLABROUS
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .2 INCH
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PUBESCENT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *SEEDS*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 6-16
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In the above cases, whether we:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) consider the varieties under *Haplanthodes tentaculatus* 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (L.)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nees or,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) think of them as coming under a Haplanthus tentaculatus
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> group;
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -the clear difference between *Haplanthodes verticillatus*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Roxb.) R.B.Majumdar and the other species (singular/plural) 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is- *cladodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> densely pubescent* *AND* *glandular hairy* in *Haplanthodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> verticillatus* (Roxb.) R.B.Majumdar while the other is *ONLY
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *densely pubescent.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If this is agreeable, then may be we finally have a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> definite idea of what is and isn't *Haplanthodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> verticillatus* (Roxb.) R.B.Majumdar based on the cladode
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> being glandular hairy?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please correct me if I have gone wrong anywhere.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 8:00 AM, surajit koley <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes for both of your questions, I think Anurag Ji.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> q1 = ref.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://florakarnataka.ces.iisc.ernet.in/hjcb2/img/pdf/Haplanthodes%20verticillatus/page_533.pdf.jpg
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> q2 = I used the term "*H. tentaculatus* group", for the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> type species as well as var. *nilgherrensis* and var.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *plumosa*.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Haplanthodes* is synonymous with *Haplanthus* and also
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with *Berekampia* in our cases.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:30 AM, Anurag Sharma <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and also, as a continuation of 2) =*Haplanthus
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tentaculatus* group?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 1:17 AM, Anurag Sharma <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sir,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe I may have a resolving idea to put forth but
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first I would like to know if:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) *Haplanthus verticillaris* Nees = *Haplanthodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> verticillatus* (Roxb.) R.B.Majumdar
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) *Haplanthus neilgherryensis *Wight = *Haplanthodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nilgherrensis* (Wight) R.B.Majumdar?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 11:31 PM, surajit koley <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I asked if any member can access the paper
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.3417/2013046. What I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> come to know is that *Haplanthodes tentaculatus* (L.)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nees is further divided in to var. *nilgherryensis
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/a/acanthaceae/haplanthodes/haplanthodes-nilgherrensis>*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> var. plumosa
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://plants.jstor.org/stable/history/10.5555/al.ap.specimen.k000885684>,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> besides type species.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> First, I do not have literature, be it century old, on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> South Indian flora. I have never seen one physical 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> species, never before
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even in images. The first time I saw/noticed it in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anurag Ji's thread
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/D5V4vxlW5nc/5q0B7fF9oQ0J>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Second, it appears to me that various uploads of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Haplanthodes*, in eFI, are very confusing.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Third, internet doesn't feature any photograph of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> related species other than those of Dinesh Ji, Prashant Ji 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and one or two
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of others.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Fourth, I do not even know how to differentiate *H.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> verticillatus* from *H. tentaculatus*.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dinesh Ji threw some light -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    1.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/NbKZ2cRILsc/znbfFPnQ7iAJ
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    2.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/C6E9D20qujk/tAcJAwm8ZEEJ
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    3.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/indiantreepix/d6pQ0ry1jP0/wfhnGOsjAWEJ
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FBI recorded, corolla in *H. verticillatus* (
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *verticillaris*) is pale lilac; against dark lilac in
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://florakarnataka.ces.iisc.ernet.in/hjcb2/herbsheet.php?id=151&cat=1
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "brilliant blue" in Dinesh Ji's KEY in link1 above.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prashant Ji has both white & blue colour *H.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nilgherryensis*.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, it is quite impossible for me to decipher the id of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this species. More so, because except the flowering spikes 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> no detail on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sepals, sizes of corolla and calyx etc are available.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If this belongs to *H. tantaculatus* group it is
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unlikely to be var. *plumosa*, because of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following herbarium -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Herb. of *Ruellia tentaculata* -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://linnean-online.org/6882/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possibly type species -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000885683
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> var. *nilgherrensis* -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000885689
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000885688
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000885687
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> var. *plumosa* -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000885684
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000885685
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>    
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://apps.kew.org/herbcat/getImage.do?imageBarcode=K000885686
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think var. *plumosa* doesn't have dense spike.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> surajit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 10:43 PM, surajit koley <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does anybody have access to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.3417/2013046?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 12:55 PM, J.M. Garg <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Forwarding again for Id assistance please.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Some earlier relevant feedback:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  efi page on Haplanthodes plumosa
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/a/acanthaceae/haplanthodes/haplanthodes-plumosa>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Haplanthodes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/species/a---l/a/acanthaceae/haplanthodes>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  species in eFIoraofindia (with details/ keys from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> published papers/ regional floras/ FRLHT/ FOI/ efloras/ 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> books etc., where
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ever available)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> From: Prashant Awale <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Date: 23 March 2015 at 14:03
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: [efloraofindia:218868] Acanthaceae Fortnight
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ::Haplanthodes sp? :: Ganapatipule:: PKA-MAR29/29: :
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To: indiantreepix <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Friends,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Came across this Haplanthodes sp. at Jaigad fort near
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ganapatipule. Could this be Haplanthodes plumosa?. 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Kindly validate the ID.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   *Botanical name:*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Haplanthodes sp.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Family:*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Acanthaceae
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Date/Time-*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 29-03-2010 /11:40 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Location- Place, Altitude, GPS- *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jaigad Fort  near Ganapatipule- Ratnagiri
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Habitat- Garden/ Urban/ Wild/ Type-*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wild
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Plant Habit- Tree/ Shrub/ Climber/ Herb-  *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Herb
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Height/Length- *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 30 to 50 cm
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Leaves Type/ Shape/ Size-*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  Opposite, 3 to 5 cm, Some leaves were acuminate and
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> some were with somewhat rounded apex ,  hairy, leaf
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> base extending down to petiole,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Inflorescence Type/ Size- *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Photograph enclosed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Flowers Size/ Colour/ Calyx/ Bracts-*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Flowers sessile, corolla approx. 8 to 12mm, purple
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (Photograph enclosed)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Fruits Type/ Shape/ Size Seeds-*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not known
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *Other Information like Fragrance, Pollinator, Uses
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> etc.- *
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Prashant
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> emails from it, send an email to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Visit this group at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> With regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> J.M.Garg
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 'Creating awareness of Indian Flora & Fauna'
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jmgarg1>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The whole world uses my Image Resource
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:J.M.Garg> of
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> more than a thousand species & eight thousand images of 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Birds, Butterflies,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Plants etc. (arranged alphabetically & place-wise). You 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can also use them
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for free as per Creative Commons license attached with 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> each image.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For identification, learning, discussion &
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation of Indian Flora, please visit/ join our 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Efloraofindia
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google e-group
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/indiantreepix> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (largest
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the world- more than 2400 members & 2,00,000 messages 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on 9.9.14) or Efloraofindia
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> website
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/> (with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a species database of more than 10,000 species & 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2,00,000 images). Winner
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of Wipro-NFS Sparrow Awards 2014 for efloraofindia
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://sites.google.com/site/efloraofindia/award-for-efloraofindia>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also author of 'A Photoguide to the Birds of Kolkata
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> & Common Birds of India'.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>  --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Google Groups "efloraofindia" group.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> emails from it, send an email to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To post to this group, send email to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected].
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Visit this group at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anurag N. Sharma
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> St. Josephs College
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bangalore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anurag N. Sharma
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> St. Josephs College
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bangalore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anurag N. Sharma
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> St. Josephs College
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bangalore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anurag N. Sharma
>>>>>>>>>>>>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year
>>>>>>>>>>>>> St. Josephs College
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Bangalore
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Anurag N. Sharma
>>>>>>>>>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year
>>>>>>>>>> St. Josephs College
>>>>>>>>>> Bangalore
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Anurag N. Sharma
>>>>>>>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year
>>>>>>>> St. Josephs College
>>>>>>>> Bangalore
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Anurag N. Sharma
>>>>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year
>>>>> St. Josephs College
>>>>> Bangalore
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Anurag N. Sharma
>>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year
>>> St. Josephs College
>>> Bangalore
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Anurag N. Sharma
>> BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year
>> St. Josephs College
>> Bangalore
>>
>
>


-- 
Anurag N. Sharma
BSc. (CBZ) 2nd Year
St. Josephs College
Bangalore

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"efloraofindia" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/indiantreepix.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to