What I feel is that we do our part and the confirmation has to come from the uploader. Irrespective of the quality of the photo, an expert who handled the plant for id or character examination would easily be able to pick some striking characters and that can be made available as a lead/guess. I would like to bring up a point that please note that what Neha ji and Bhagyasri ji and few other are doing. They cross check based on our suggestions and get back to s critically based on relevant literature, flora or any other source of publication. This should be the way it should work out, as per my opinion.
I think we can provide the lead with supportive evidence to go ahead. The later part has to be done by the uploader. Regards Giby > One request to the group: > > no doubt its very clear that the plant photo is not 100 percent sure about > the identity if posted again as resurfing for identification. just one > request to those who are posting again for resurfing, if he or she can give > or add little comments on the earlier post by the member for the identity.. > than it would become easy to seperate them from another species.. or it can > be discuss by the moderator member of the group and than put for resurfing > with some extra details.. > > one question.. is it necessary to identify every not clear photos (i mean > some times photos are not so clear to identify the species level and if > someone is doing so, i think it can only be a guess and not a 100 percent > proper identification), than why to stretch on such things and waste time... > by putting again and again it for resurfing... > > > regards > > > > -- > - H.S. > > A scientific man ought to have no wishes, no affections, - a mere heart of > stone > > -- GIBY KURIAKOSE PhD Ashoka Trust for Research in Ecology and the Environment (ATREE), Royal Enclave, Jakkur Post, Srirampura Bangalore- 560064 India Phone - +91 9448714856 (Mobile) visit my pictures @ http://www.flickr.com/photos/giby
